OccamsRazer @ OccamsRazer @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

373

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bro the irony... you don't understand religion but happily assume that it's about pedophilia. I think you got a hard on for hating religion and have a hard time seeing anything else.

There is a difference between wanting to deal with things internally without involving authorities, and actively promoting pedophilia. But I'm not here to go to bat for Catholics, I'm just pointing out the difference.

Hold on, you seriously believe that the purpose of the catholic church is to promote pedophilia?

Not sure if you are just being an edge lord or if you are a moron.

I don't mind you asking except that you are missing my point, which is that doctors have less patient confidentiality than therapists. I say this to contradict the original assertion that doctors report things, so priests should too, which is faulty logic. Comparing therapists to priests would be a better analogy in this context.

I guess I would define a pedophile ring as an organization whose purpose is to abuse children.

They have more patient confidentiality than doctors, but I'm not sure of the specifics.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Abusers-occupation-Occupation-n_tbl4_237962292

More the point is that therapists don't have the same obligations as doctors. Therapists can keep confidentiality of things that doctors aren't allowed to. The guy i responded to was comparing priests to doctors, but a better comparison would be comparing them to therapists.

They have some obligations in cases of child endangerment or suicide, direct threats to others. I'm not sure of the details, if it's similar expectations or what.

It's not like the pope or the catholic leadership is encouraging pedophiles. They've covered things up that happened, but it's pretty wild to act like it's some kind of pedo ring.

By straight numbers I'm sure that's the case, but i doubt its true by percentage. But to be honest I'm not sure if the study included parents.

Teaching has the most pedophiles, followed by music tutor, and priests/clerics are 3rd.

Therapists are allowed to maintain confidentiality.

That only applies if you are the objective truth. If you are wrong, then it's just another tool for bigotry, an excuse to ignore other opinions.

Yeah you are right. There have been a couple others, but quite a few attempts to ban various parties. I don't quite understand the system and it's possible that banning a party there isn't near as big of a deal as it seems to me. If a party were banned in the united states, it would be very alarming. I think the only party ever banned was the communist party in 1950s, but even that is no longer really in effect.

No the court labeled afd as "confirmed right wing extremist" and someone else decided that that meant they couldn't participate.

Who gets to decide who is a fascist and therefore doesn't deserve to participate in democracy? What is the criteria for not deserving a voice? How do you define fascist? Maybe I'm cynical, but if you can eliminate popular political opposition by branding them as something, that's a lot of motivation to brand them.

Advertising, marketing, and the stock market are the worst aspects of capitalism, and the system could be improved dramatically with heavy restrictions on all of those. Yeah it would shrink the economy, but the new steady state would be much better. Less waste, better stuff.

There's only one political party in German history who banned other political parties. Just because you call a different party a fascist, doesn't mean you get a pass to act like a fascist.