NounsAndWords @ NounsAndWords @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

570

Joined

2 yr. ago

Frog: "Hey, did any of you guys notice the water get a couple degrees hotter?"

Other Frogs: Already boiled alive

“I am going to get to the bottom of who is responsible,” he said, adding he would pursue these issues “on my own, outside of this trial.”

I was a bit confused how a Judge would just decide to start investigating some additional matter that is not formally before them to decide.

I'm halfways with you for the first like...few million, but after you're already rich, do you really want to be jerking off Elon Musk every day for a living?

"Our principles do not have a price tag, nor will they be compromised — ever," her note continued. "And no matter how hard they try, we will not be distracted by sideline critics who don’t understand our mission."

"You couldn't pay us to stop hating on minorities. It's a part of our mission."

Yeah, he's going to survive through a very painful recovery from twenty-two stab wounds.

And then he'll be put back in prison. With the other prisoners again.

Two cases of leaders selectively choosing not to believe credible intelligence of a threat to innocent lives when it's politically convenient to do so?

information independence

independent from what?

From the article:

Rent is only about 2-5 per cent of costs for most companies with offices in the CBD, whereas salaries and wages make up about 40 per cent.

The conclusions about the EU job market don't necessarily translate to the US, the researchers caution, noting that their results contrast with previous findings from American researchers.

Research on the effect of AI on jobs in the US has indicated that generative AI could cause 2.4 million job losses by 2030. Large tech players like IBM have also cited AI as a reason to lay off thousands of people whose jobs could be replaced by software.

But I know it's better

Better for whom?

I'd say more than that. I don't think anyone is that close to AGI...yet

A calculator does most of it too, but this is a LLM that can do lots of other things also, which is a big piece of the "general" part of AGI.

Richard Feynman said “You have to keep a dozen of your favorite problems constantly present in your mind, although by and large they will lay in a dormant state. Every time you hear or read a new trick or a new result, test it against each of your twelve problems to see whether it helps. Every once in a while there will be a hit, and people will say, “How did he do it? He must be a genius!”

We are close to a point where a computer that can hold all the problems in its "head" can test all of them against all of the tricks. I don't know what math problems that starts to solve but I bet a few of them would be applicable to cryptology.

But then again, I have no idea what I'm talking about and just making bold guesses based on close to no information.

You just need to pick the pieces you want and discard/ignore the ones you don't!

That's an extreme position that ignores a lot of realities. For someone living paycheck to paycheck with children to feed, losing a job to go vote is not even a question. They're under duress.

Not that it makes it any better, but a lot of those people who can't afford to move also can't afford to vote (time off work, travel to a polling station, time to actually look into what's going on)

They're only horrible when you aren't rich and/or care about the safety and well-being of others.

True. As long as it doesn't violate any employment law...or administrative law...or relevant contracts...or any other relevant area of law...and you don't mind weeks of headlines "PRESIDENT FIRES MILITARY, PUTS COUNTRY AT RISK"...

Yes, but capitalism leads to creativity and innovation. Just think of all the ways they've managed to avoid increasing minimum wage and convince minimum wage workers that they aren't worth any more.

You also informed the leadership team that allowing the company to be destroyed "would be consistent with the mission."

You are God damned right that shutting everything down is one of the roles of a non-profit Board focused on AI safety.

I was about to respond with pretty much the top half of what you said. But I think an early step in AGI is how we start splitting hairs about what "counts." And the number of things that we were "supposed" to always be better at keep changing with each new advance.

In ten years I don't think we will have clear, unquestionable Artificial General Intelligence, but I think there will be some people trying to explain that yes the model can act and respond exactly as a human would in the exact same circumstance but it's not really thinking or feeling anything. I certainly don't think the AI we're playing with in 10 years will be based primarily on text prediction, but there are still just so many different routes being explored in this field, it sure doesn't feel like a real plateau yet. Maybe I'll change my mind when GPT5 is only marginally more capable than GPT4.