I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently?
Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from "algorithm is to blame for deaths" into "algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases", which of course it can't...
But you are only allowed to report things that seem important to Americans in any community that might be visited by Americans. Come on, everybody knows that.
I dislike that
a) it's considered binary, while the vast majority of people will not be even close to either extreme
b) people put themselves into those extremes anyway, throw around the wildest (and mostly useless) definitions of what "being an introvert" is supposed to mean, more often than not dripping with victim mentality
c) people use their supposed status akin to a neurodiversity
d) people openly blaming others for not being allowed to be like they are because others dare to be like they are ("I have it so hard in life because I'm an introvert in a world full of extroverts")
e) people define large chunks of themselves around some label they largely defined themselves and want this label to be respected as if it was a real thing, an illness almost.
f) people define large chunks of themselves around some label that is just meant to very loosely describe some aspect of a human being's character, not the whole human
Thats the issue. Not only with poverty, but with overspending in general. Usually, money savin measures take time to become noticeable, since there is always some inertia in money flows (things that were already die when the saving measures were started, subscriptions, etc), so people who overspent will immediately see a drastic downfall of their living standards when they start saving, but still overshoot their budget for at least a few weeks usually, until all the overspending is paid off and the savings start to kick in. That's a really dangerous phase because people often struggle to understand if they are doing it right or not.
So, we take the magazine diet of the month approach yet again? Instead of learning healthy spending habits, we barge in with the extremest measures we can find, inevitably fail and try the next needlessly extreme thing, repeating the cycle until we have lost so much self esteem in the process that we tell ourselves that we just aren't made to save money?
Well then, this website over there told me that they have got shiny new shirts reduced from 1899,- to just 15 bucks, but only if I order 65 of them in the next.two minutes. Take my credit card! I'll start no spending year right after! Pinky promise!
standing on the shoulders of giants.