NoiseColor @ NoiseColor @startrek.website

Posts

0

Comments

444

Joined

2 yr. ago

That is a wild and completely wrong assertion. I'm not Microsoft. Im a guy that has used Firefox last year and the experience was sub par. So I switched back.

I'm not letting anyone do anything. You are exaggerating to the absurd.

At what point do you think it starts being the problem of the software?

Because I think that happened a while ago.

There are many misconceptions in your short sentence.

I would, if there wasn't for my personal experience of using Firefox, when I had to switch to other browsers for some websites I used.

Its because of that, that when we decided to ignore Firefox, I wasn't against it.

I want to like it, but it's so hard. It's easier to like almost everything else.

It was humorous. I try to take stuff lightly.

Its not a bad idea. Nobody uses Firefox. We tested and there is no reason for us to start putting in the effort.

Look, its not like we wont notice a shift like that. It would be very easy to adapt if the situation warranted.

It's almost impossible to calculate revenue lost, but as much as we tried, it was 0 or almost 0.

Again, we don't even check anymore.

That's all really nice. But the fact is, we use what works. It's a pragmatic decision. They're are so few Firefox users and on the end issues are not very common.

That's great for you. These issues are not that common really.

Again, I'm not a soldier for any software. I don't care. It's a pragmatic business decision.

Again, I'm not a soldier for any particular software. I'm a pragmatic user. I will use whatever works and will develop of whatever works.

Some apps and websites are broken on Firefox, that's why we don't use it and don't optimise for it. We don't care it's not the fault of Firefox. It's a pragmatic business decision that is practically inconsequential, because Firefox has so few users.

Ok boomer.

I'm happy to reply. I don't think I'm complicit to anything else but an inconsequential business decision and I don't care one way or the other about it. I used to use Firefox, but I stopped because some apps were broken on Firefox. I'm not a soldier for any browser im a pragmatic user.

Haha, no. We don't pray. We make web apps to make money. Catering to a negligible users who for some reason want to use the single browser with issues, that's up to them.

Well no. It doesn't work like that. Unfortunately.

The number of people who act like that is negligible. We tested for that.

We don't see it as that we are sloppy but that Firefox is not a good browser. We came to that conclusion because no other browser acts like that.

I work in web and app development company and we don't check Firefox anymore, because it's the only outlier and has not many users. But mainly because we wouldn't have to do it for any other browser specifically and Firefox is not special in any way. The errors come from it being more strict, which might sound good, but it's actually really just inconvenient. The errors go from image alignment issues to apps not working at all. We don't fix any of that.

Nobody in their right mind thought Israel was moral in any way for the past 60 years.

I don't think that's going to happen. Israel gets it's "mystique" from the fact it is surrounded by enemies and any strategic mistake can mean it's destruction. Also sure, this horrible mass murder and genocide they are committing is just beyond savage and utterly inexcusable, but I don't think any serious journalist could say they were not capable of it before the hamas attack. They have literally been doing it for more than half a century. This will not be their downfall, this is what they are and always have been.