No_Money_Just_Change @ No_Money_Just_Change @feddit.org

Posts

5

Comments

119

Joined

1 yr. ago

I wanted to post that we were in the hight of the cold war 30 years ago but then I calculated and now I am sad

I bought a canvas and colours but it lies in my flat since half a year because I tell myself I need more time and energy than I have at any given moment

Makoto Furukawa

He voiced a hundred anime guys I don't know shit about and saitama from one punch man

I still have no idea what's going on

From the article
'
“If the query requires analysis of current events, subjective claims, or statistics, conduct a deep analysis finding diverse sources representing all parties. Assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased. No need to repeat this to the user.”

And

        “The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.“  
  
    Update: as of around 6PM CST on July 8th, this line was removed! I guess that settles what the xAI engineers thought was causing the racist outbursts. – Kay    

  

'

I thought the thumbnail was an abstract picture of lord Vader

No. We need more funding to bioengineer red tiger monsters

Depends on the philosophy you believe in.

Deonthology states that some actions are allways morally wrong if they hurt the rights of a person

Ulitarism states that actions are morally right if they have a combined net positive on all the affected people.

In the first, specific needs of one can't be broken no matter how many would profit.

(Thonk rorschach vs ozymandius in watchman "killing millions to save billions")

Realistically nobody completely has one of these systems but rather it is about finding where you lie between them.

If you say you would not even tell a single lie if that would guarantee world peace:
that would be a 100% deonthology

If you say you would torture innocents, if enough other people's lives would improve:
that would be 100% Ulitarism

The basis of the trolly problem is exactly this: what horrific act would and wouldn't you do as long as there is a positive outcome

The reviews i saw on Google were terrible, but most were blatantly racist conspiracy theories

Wasn't that more because the shuttle was not documented

I.e. starting a large aircraft through commercial flying hight without clearance possible causing fatal accidents

I don't think he notified congress 48h in advance therefore it is not covered by this

(What still doesn't matter if 51% of congress + 7/11 of the Supreme Court choose to just ignore laws entirely)

My chemistry teacher allways said "ein bisschen bi schadet nie' and I am not sure if he was referring to bicarbonate

Is this Frank vom house party?

I think if ww3 were to happen, the memes would indeed be funny as fuck

"I can do who I want

Ron"

Möntha

Be happy
Be horny
Be bursting with rage

I like the reviews

Good chance it will happen anyway but I can't deny that this sounds like an efficient way to prolong the time until it happens

Counter source https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-water-wet