For example, 1 in 10 dentists recommended a specific brand of toothpaste.
You could know 10 dentists in your town and not one of them recommends that specific toothpaste. But in another town 2 out of 10 might. This means between both towns you are left with a 1 out of 10 average.
1/10 is equal to 2/20 = 10%
So, if one town might have a really high shooting rate and 100% of the residents in that town were witnesses and the next town over had no shootings at all.
If we assume both towns have the same number of residents we would be left with a 50% of all residents in the area are witnesses to a shooting. This means if you lived in the town with no shooting and were told 50% of residents were witnesses you would not be able to find a single person to confirm the theory. Even if you knew everyone in your specific town.
There are plenty of examples around the global and what usually plays out next.
The trouble is not that automakers can't continue to produce/assembly, its that prices will skyrocket (higher cost to source materials) which means consumers will need to pay more.
Lets start poaching America Tech and knowledge workers to immigrat to Canada, could be a excellent opportunity especially with all the cuts and "efficiency restructuring "
I understand the sentiment, but just one thing to note/point out, without argument to your point or view.
These are American business that both employ Canadian people and pay Canadian taxes. The profits are American on the one hand, but the economic stimulus to Canada is a benefit on the other hand.
Personally I am a little conflicted in this, I don't want to see Canadian people loose their jobs.
Though if a foreign owned company is operating inside of our borders with no Canadian presence this would be a no-brainer. I would probably want that type of company to double their resolve and invest in our people with in country manufacturing and production as a example.
Is this a miscarriage cake? That's awful!