Nachorella @ Nachorella @lemmy.sdf.org

Just a silly feller

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

383

Joined

2 yr. ago

I am a pompous buffoon, so that checks out.

Millions of animals are killed less humanely every day for food. Why are people so worked up about this one?

edit: I guess it's only ok to support the inhumane murder of animals if you don't know them and want to eat them. I understand now.

This is pretty unhinged but I do kinda get a giggle imagining him and several other losers walking around in their grey Elon Musk shirts.

There's also titles where the Devs cooked and ended up spending too much time and resources and underdelivered on huge flops. See Daikatana or whatever kickstarter game is disappointing people at the moment. Making games is just difficult, let alone making something that everyone loves.

Fun fact: There's a type of squat called a 'Sissy Squat' which gets its name from Sisyphus.

Until we have a world that recognises that the internet is now a right and governments should be subsidising search and other services so that they don't turn into useless ad delivery systems - I'm ok paying for Kagi.

Hold up, the guy funding a genocide against Palestine also opposes their statehood? Woah.

Yeah, so much US content gets geoblocked here. It's super weird, just a random clip from a show on youtube? woops, looks like that content isn't available in your country.

I know not much about global politics. Could this be cheeky ww3? Or is this sort of thing pretty common?

Fair enough. I liked the message, but I guess it's a bit inderwhelming if you're expecting more information.

how come?

I've recently taken up this attitude, slowly acquiring tools as I go. Just small stuff, but it feels good to repair instead of replace.

America might take the crown but I can assure you AU and NZ have plenty of trash to eat.

cum too juicy

You keep trying to have it both ways. You've finally conceded that there's 36% of land used to grow livestock feed. But now it's time to shift the poles somewhere else. At least you've started reading and trying to back up what you're saying.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/time-to-rethink-corn/

36% of corn grown in the US goes to feeding livestock. Not including the stuff you're talking about like byproducts from ethanol and such.

Habitable land is not the same as the ability to grow food on it.

Umm yeah? No one said it was.

So most stats that are pulled out of someones ass, because they came up with a system that says all feed we provide to animals is more than the tonnage we eat ourselves. No shit we feed way more grain to a 2k lb cow. It's 2k fucking lbs. It doesn't even provide a breakout of what isn't actually human consumable, because it's bullshit stats.

When talking about feed grown specifically for livestock it doesn't actually matter if it's human consumable or not, it's land that could be used to grow human consumable food. They make the distinction between cropland and grazing land pretty clear.

Also you don't just get to dismiss science when it doesn't suit whatever you think. You asked for numbers, there they are.

And if I combine the road as part of my land in front of my farm I have more land...this is fucking stupid. Grazing land is not usually suitable for plants. It's why crops are not planted usually in places that are rocky or have to many hills.

You're source is bullshit.

There are things that can be done with grazing land other than planting crops and almost all of them are better for the environment than having livestock graze on it. They are just talking about the total land at that point, not trying to convince you of anything, stop reading everything so defensively.

And also it's a pretty credible source and it's definitely better than your anecdotal 'we literally don't grow food for cattle at all, ever' nonsense.

We use more than twice as much land to grow feed for livestock than we do for humans, and the livestock only supplies 18% of global calories. It's an inefficient use of land full stop. When there are more people we will need more efficient sources of food. This might mean farming more human food and therefore less animal feed.

This isn't about prudishness. No one's offended by the picture. It makes people uncomfortable because it's from a playboy. The problem is that it brings the objectification of women to the fore in a male dominated field where women often face sexual harassment and aren't taken seriously.

Stop making stuff up, please. Idk what you do on your farm but globally we absolutely grow a lot of food for animals.

Ok but we use twice as much land to grow animal feed than we do human food and it has all the same drawbacks. And then the meat we get still only provides 18% of our calories.