MxM111 @ MxM111 @kbin.social

Posts

1

Comments

1,831

Joined

2 yr. ago

Importantly we do not judge all by the actions of few.

It was only after it reaches your ISP, not before…

Well, a photo of painting is clearly NOT a photo of Jennifer Lawrence.

You sure about all that? Hunger within German population was present, the red army (part of the Allies) was known for rapes, and Israel did not bomb to the extend Allies bombed Dresden, not even close. The civilian losses in WW2 were massive. The cities after WW2 were in ruins, and both sides (with exception of Paris) did not hesitate to bomb cities if there were military targets including military manufacturing facilities.

Yes war is ugly, but not every war is genocide, most of them are not.

Also, not all of them are photos.

Yes, but did you actually say that? Like aloud?

TIL

The goal of Hamas, stated many times, is to destroy Israel. Hamas actions are terrorism. Hamas goal is genocide aimed against one specific group of people. Your example of WW2 is actually a good one. It was not a genocide despite of the fact that Allies bombed essentially to zero cities like Dresden. Allies goal was to remove Nazi from power. Israel goal is to remove Hamas from power. So, what’s the difference?

It denies right to exist. It is not “invisibility game”. It has direct goal to erase the state and people in it. Hamas actions directly confirm it. For years it attacked civilian population with the goal of eradicate it. They are openly stating this the same multiple times themselves. They are showing it in their murderous actions and you pretend that it is some kind of “invisibility game”? Just Google “Hamas statements about Israel right to exist”. They want to physically destroy it. Jezus!

Edit: Also, your double standards appalling: you reject Israel legitimacy because 70years ago they used terrorism tactics to get rid of Brits. But you seems totaly OK with Hamas today.

Hamas continues reflecting legitimacy of Israel, it never recognized it. Read any encyclopedia entry on Hamas. Sure, they would like to get all the land according to 1967 agreement, but they do not promise to recognize Israel even then.

Let’s not pretend that destroying Israel means just dissolving the state. Hamas quite clearly demonstrated this with recent attack aimed to brutally kill 1000+ of civilian Jews.

In order to be called genocide goals are crucial. If you are saying that it does not fit definition of genocide, then don’t use this word.

Espresso has less caffeine than large mug of drip coffee especially of morning light or medium roasts. And many coffee makers just make twice more water in double shot, not twice more coffee.

In my case it is my father.

Us speaks de facto on international language of communication. Other countries have much better second language programs because it is needed if you go outside of your (relatively small) country and or consume information on internet the vast majority of which is in English. The same story is for any English speaking country. Do you think that UK is different?

I seriously do not think that when people use the word mankind they do anything that has negative consequences. The word has very gender neutral meaning today and if anyone would want today to change it, then they actually do disservice to equality movement because they look like crazies.

That’s what I asked example of.

Making money on personal information while might be immoral, but legal (as far as what Google does), this guy did something different and illegal. I honestly do not see similarities.

East Roman Empire.

I was talking specifically about salmonella. As I said, the other bacteria likely can penetrate the chicken meat.

Well, then as my sentence states, they are not in the right mind.