Mr_Dr_Oink @ Mr_Dr_Oink @lemmy.world

Posts

7

Comments

1,001

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ok. Let's not misrepresent what i said.

Firstly, you dont round up 4.17 to 5.

Second. I said i am in the UK, so i dont bay any dollars a month.

Third, I pay for 1 quarter of £5 a month, which is the monthly cost of a family account. Which i said i have. So it's actually £1.25 ($1.64) a month.

Forth, The games that come with the expansio are not 40 years old.the expansion gives you the n64, gameboy advance and genesis games, which are 28, 23 and 35 years old respectively.

Fifth, as well that i get 48 mario kart maps, as well ss some other games. On top of the online play which you get in the standard pack, and some other bits.

Sixth, i have played and completed mario 64 and bajo kazooie on the n64 emulator. I have introduced my son to mario kart 64 as well. I also am slowly working my way through jet force gemini. I have complete goldeneye played multiplayer with my brothers here and there and am working through perfect dark. On the GBA emulator i am playing golden sun. 10 hours is a severe underestimate for all that and more.

Finally. If you are salty about BOTW, then thats your problem. But dont go around lying about what i said to make yourself feel better.

That's $4.17 a month. It's even cheaper if you get a family account and share with your family and / or friends like i do. (I am actually UK, but it seems the US price is the most quoted.) And comes with all the n64 (and the new gamecube) games. Its the cheapest online service of the three main consoles.

Also, to be clear. Im not a big switch guy, and i think nintendo are a greedy company. I mostly play playstation these days but my switch is handy and there are some amazing first party games.

From what i am reading only mario party jamboree and kirby upgrades will cost money, the zelda ones are free if you pay for switch online and metroid and pokemon dont appear to have any proce attached to their upgrades.

The running theory is thst most games wont cost to upgrade unless they offer expanded content. But expansions costing money is nothing new.

We need to change to format to not include this clown.

Maybe something like this:

Just turn them on with the switch.....

That is an island!

⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣠⣤⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢀⣴⠟⠛⠉⠉⠉⠉⠛⠛⠷⣦⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢰⡿⠁⠀⠀⣾⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠛⢷⣄⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⠾⠿⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠙⠻⢷⣶⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢹⣧⠀⠀⠛⠀⠀⠀⢀⣶⠿⠛⠃⠀⣀⣠⣤⣤⣀⣠⣴⣾⠟⠛⢷⡄⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠻⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣾⣿⡿⠋⠀⠉⢻⣿⣿⣟⠀⠀⠈⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠹⣷⡀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣤⣼⣿⣿⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⠉⠛⠛⠷⣶⡟⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣶⣿⣋⠉⠁⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣤⣴⠿⠃⢰⣿⠃⠀⠙⣿⡀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠁⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⡄⠀⠙⠛⢿⣶⣿⡇⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢷⣄⠀⢻⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⣦⣤⡀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣧⣀⣡⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⡏⠀⣴⠿⢛⣻⡿⠛⠛⠋⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⣰⡟⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⡾⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⡿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

EVEN OLDER!

They still won't take it.

Yeah, pretty sure i use it for capitalising symbols on the right of the keyboard.

In fact, i think i might use it for some of the symbols above the numbers, too.

I need to get in front of a keyboard and find out.

This was always the plan.

Who copied it from Wayne Gretzky

I wanted to see if this was really a quote by Mark Twain and found this article on snopes which states that there is no evidence linking this quote to Twain. Instead there is a quote from one of his books with a similar sentiment so its possible it was someone paraphrasing Twain

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-mark-twain-say-its-easier-to-fool-people-than-to-convince-them-that-they-have-been-fooled/

So, ironically, the quote is meta AF.

Would you rather Jack with Black or Black with Jack?

I dodnt not read it because "reading bores me." i didn't read it because i was busy. I have people round digging up my driveway, i have a 7 week old baby and a 5 year old son destroying the house :p i have prep for work and i just did a bit of browsing and saw the post. Felt compelled to comment for a brief break.

Im not sure what you mean by "silly opinion." Everyone who has been arguing with me has been stating that everyone knows that teslas dont use LiDAR, and thats why this test failed. If everyone knows this, then why did it need proving. It was a pointless test. Did you know: fire is hot and water is wet? Did you know we need to breathe air to live?

No?

Better make an elaborate test, film it, edit the video, make it last long enough to monetise, post it to youtube, and let people write articles about it to post to other websites. All to prove what everyone already knows about a dangerous self driving car that's been around for 11 years...

I am sorry, i just dont get it. I felt like I was pointing out the obvious in saying that a test that's tailored to give a specific result, which we already know the result of, is a farcical test. It's pointless.

Excuse me.

1. Did you write the article? I genuinely wasn't aiming my comment at you. It was merely commentary on the context that is inferred by the title. I just watched a clip of the car hitting the board. I didn't read the article, so i specified that i was referring to the article title. Not the author, not the article itself. Because it's the title that i was commenting on.
2. That wasn't an 18 wheeler, it was a ground level board with a photorealistic picture that matched the background it was set up against. It wasnt a mural on a wall, or some other illusion with completely different properties. So no, i think this extremely specific set up for this test is unrealistic and is not comparable to actual scientific research, which i dont dispute. I dont dispute the fact that the lack of LiDAR is why teslas have this issue and that an autonomous driving system with only one type of sensor is a bad one. Again. I said i hate elon and tesla. Always have.

All i was saying is that this test, which is designed in a very specific way and produces a very specific result, is pointless. Its like me getting a bucket with a hole in and hypothesising that if i pour in waterz it will leak out of the hole, and then proving that and saying look! A bucket with a hole in leaks water...

That's fair.

I didn't intend to give tesla a pass. I hoped that qualifying what i said with a "fuck tesla and fuck elon" would show that.

But i didn't think about it that way.

In my defense my point was more about saying "what did you expect" the car to do in a test designed to show how a system that is not designed to perform a specific function cant perform that specific function.

We know that self driving is bullshit, especially the tesla brand of it. So what is Mark's test and video really doing?

But on reflection, i guess there are still a lot of people out there that dont know this stuff, so at the very least, a popular channel like his will go a longway to raising awareness of this sort of flaw.

Fair point. But it doesn't address the other things i said, really.

But i suppose,based on already getting downvoted, that I've got a bad take, either that or people who are downvoting me dont understand i can hate tesla and elon, think their cars are shit and still see that tests like this can be nuanced. The attitude that paints with a broad brush is the type of attitude that got trump elected....