Hey, even introverts like fun environments. A fun environment can be the determining factor if an introvert even joins in or has fun! The sterilization of corporate spaces hurts everyone except greedy inhuman trash that only care about money.
Too chatty, stuff getting hidden from the user which makes it less useful yet still cluttered, change for change's sake, teasing at notification nightmares... There's a lot to dislike in OP's post!
I think that's a small part of it, the lack of nuance from new coders, but the origins weren't so cut and dry, IMO. It was really how poorly things were supported by browsers. Tables became used for styling because they were the only way to achieve some layouts that would have any hope of calculating correctly in the browser. JavaScript became used for active elements because html/css originally couldn't do anything dynamic or responsive. Many things became divs simply because they were the only building block that didn't come saddled with tons of preconditions and assumptions. etc, etc, etc.
HTML5 and ECMA2015 are when it started to turn around. Browsers finally got their shit together and supported a proper, useful baseline set of features that could cover most use cases, and the resulting standardizations made a HUGE difference. If it stayed going the way it was pre-HTML5, I wouldn't be surprised if we'd be wrestling with some popular framework trying to wedge a new standard in next to HTML in the browsers... Heck, that probably would've happened anyways if HTML weren't just glorified XML (meaning it's already nearly infinitely extensible)!
Because many of the frameworks, including Angular and React, were getting started while HTML and JS specs and the support of those specs were a giant hodgepodge MESS.
Why are so many things divs instead of standard components? Because for WAY too long, those components weren't standard. Some browsers didn't even fully support basic components or styling options that had been standard for years.
Why is everything a div? Because in many browsers, divs got the most feature support.
The frameworks seem nonsensical and dumb because they're covering up a LOT of even worse things.
Not to say a ton of nasty things cannot remain, or new gross things crop up, but at least this one has a history that's more interesting than, "they designed it poirly". Nope, a lot of the problems have no design at all, or might've been worse with a more "standard" implementation!
They didn't say, "I have no idea why", they said it's soulless and annoying. Capitalism truly produces garbage. It doesn't matter that there is a reason for bad decisions. They're still bad decisions.
Nah. Religion has an opinion about everything. Much, MUCH different than politics literally having an impact on everything. Even a fully secular society would have political efficacy to consider.
I used to GPU passthrough a 7900 xtx. Just pass through the whole PCIE device and don't try to partition it or any fancy stuff. All that likely won't work unless you have specific workstation cards, anyways. Just pass it through so the VM gets all of the gpu. Then, the only performance issues should come only from any tomfoolery with CPU settings or other performance settings like not having all the hardware virtualization hooks turned on.
Though fair warning: I had lots of odd issues, like the GPU not soft-resetting after crashes, and not being able to soft-reboot the VM. Because the commercial drives often do not have all of the power states and driver hooks necessary to totally reboot/etc while staying powered and attached to a bus.
No, it is not security through obscurity. It's a message signature algorithm, which are used in cryptography all the time.
You're falling for the classic paradox of security: it has to work for someone. OF COURSE if you get all of the keys and every detail of the process you can crack it. That's true of ALL CRYPTOGRAPHY. If someone knows everything including the keys, it's too late for any 'secure' device.
Nah, that's mostly the "AI" machine learning crap. That stuff is definitely at present garbage that does nothing but eat electricity and bloat nvidia's stock price.
Nah man, language is messy and people are lazy. Language is messy meaning people generally don't get so detail oriented and pedantic when someone says an absolute that clearly has some exceptions. People are lazy meaning most people aren't going to care to hash out the specifics of the edge cases that don't fit the generic statement.
Your test seems to be more about how pedantic everyone is, and god I hope Lemmy loses that to reddit...
It means they exist (see trans rights). Though yes, it doesn't really speak to what a society must accept as sexualized that something simply exists in counter to the norm.
To think such silly things is equivalent to religious people trying to protect their kids from "catching the gay" or becoming a lesbian simply because they met one. Just because it exists doesn't mean it has to become a norm for everyone, and just because it exists doesn't suddenly redefine the norm. Such braindead thoughts show up in far too many places. (like the previous comment)
I would phrase that near-last sentiment, "...in a sexy body." instead. No one should be oggled simply for being sexy, but if they are sexualizing themselves, (like dressing up for a night club) I'd argue that can indicate a desire to be oggled. They still should not be objectified, but when someone is trying to look sexy, I bet most people would be disappointed to get zero glances.
Hey, even introverts like fun environments. A fun environment can be the determining factor if an introvert even joins in or has fun! The sterilization of corporate spaces hurts everyone except greedy inhuman trash that only care about money.