Calculators don't need heaps of power to run. Calculators are not trained on the copyrighted works of artists. And that's only the start of the issues with your argument.
Someone else mentioned Habitica already, there are a few out there. I think they usually call it gamification. The only one I tried and was able to commit to was Walkscape (specifically gamifying getting out), although I've been slacking due to nasty winter weather.
Nobody has claimed you support the conservatives in this thread up until this comment at least, they've only debated the points you have and happen to disagree with your stance because it doesn't hold up. Don't fall for the trap narrative of thinking everyone here hates you just because they think you're conservative. They are annoyed because while there have been some good posts and points in favor of him getting his security clearance and instances of previous conservative opposition leaders being able to act on the information provided by CSIS, you have provided nothing but the same points Pierre is trying to use to convince us it's better if he doesn't. You said it yourself, dogmatic adherence to a narrative. If this has never been an issue for past conservative leaders, never been an issue for other opposition party leaders, why is it for Pierre?
So far, both liberals and conservatives have promised housing GST tax relief. Liberals for first time buyers, conservatives for any buyers. One of these makes a whole lot more sense to me. Why give a GST break to Bob who's buying his 4th property to rent out?
I've been asking for years why our opposition party leader refuses to get a security clearance, or even attend briefings that Justin Trudeau had to ask CSIS to rewrite the rules of so he could also be briefed. The "liberals don't want me speaking freely!" excuse is starting to piss me off. What's the actual reason Pierre? Too afraid to see how foreign interference might affect your party and instead want to plug your ears about it? Or is it he just can't get one and this speaking freely stuff just happens to be a convinient excuse? Either way, I don't buy his reasoning as being legitimate.
Good luck, it's been 280 days since I put in for my renewal and it's still apparently only passes the initial review. Called about 4 times now, no help at all. Maybe the AB CFO will be a bit better for time.
Hopefully they find a way to apply the fix permanently. I just did 2 RGH3 mods over the weekend which is the easiest hardware mod for the 360 and it was more challenging than I expected.
I would fucking love that. I find it unlikely but I really want to work in space manufacturing without moving to the USA. I know there are a handful of companies here, but not enough.
It's not just the FAA, it's all aviation medicals. I'm a Canadian pilot who hasn't been able to fly for years due to a ridiculously harsh ruling from our medical board requiring years of tests and thousands of dollars out of pocket if I ever want to have the chance to fly again. All over something my local aviation doctor predicted would take a month or two and I'd be back in the air. I tried to fight it but the review process is a joke and took a year before they even contacted me about my case. By that point I had dropped out of the university where I was doing my training to become a commercial pilot.
The big issue is aviation has zero tolerance for risk. Feeling depressed? Medical revoked. Issues sleeping? Medical revoked. Chest aches? Medical revoked. All it can take sometimes is a small issue. The thing is that, lets be honest, given the choice no-one really wants to get on a plane with a depressed or sleep deprived pilot. It's added risk, so instead we require our pilots to be the healthiest one can be. But everyone has issues, even if you know it or not. There's a reason alcohol abuse is so common in aviation. The thing that really needs to get figured out is, what's the solution here? We either make pilots to continue to hide any health issues they have from their aviation medical doctor and pretend they don't exist, until one day something horrible but totally preventable happens, or we start addressing the medical issues pilots face and being more lenient on what would take away their medical certificate - but then if something happens as a result the liability is now on the aviation governing body for allowing someone with a known issue to fly. The aviation medical system is fundamentally broken but I have no clue how it can be fixed.
I don't think he actually said that though, the only quote I saw that included the word dumb was "It's not in my habit to agree with The Wall Street Journal. Donald, they point out that even though you're a very smart guy, this is a very dumb thing to do".
No, any weather radar around here is either owned / operated by airports or the military. Although if the price were low enough that'd be a pretty cool hobby to get into, with many legal hurdles I'm sure lol. I'm sure some individuals would pay for the premium weather provider who have the radars, that's what I'm proposing they scrape the data from. Like you say, emergency data is really where this will hurt people, especially in areas with hurricanes and tropical storms.
Moose @ Moose @moose.best Posts 2Comments 197Joined 2 yr. ago
Calculators don't need heaps of power to run. Calculators are not trained on the copyrighted works of artists. And that's only the start of the issues with your argument.
What a shit take.