MonkRome @ MonkRome @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

289

Joined

2 yr. ago

Despite the down votes I suspect most linguists would agree with you as they generally disagree with prescriptivism. Language is fluid and ever changing. Many of the phrases we have that have survived hundreds of years have altered and changed many times over to fit the era. Many linguists believe language always alters towards efficiency over time. Staunchly insisting people continue to use things in the original way is just classism disguised as education. Ironically, yours was the more educated comment in here, imo.

He has a long history of retweeting Nazis and agreeing with them. It's an indictment on our society that this is so little known even in the USA.

I've been trying e-books, usually when I find something I want to read it will say something like you are 38th in line. Minnesota.

Psychology has come a long way in the last 50 years. I used to think like you, and even now maintain a healthy dose of skepticism, but therapy absolutely can improve your life. It's not much of a scam if it's working for most people. It's just not going to solve all you problems. If anything it just makes you more aware and better equipped to deal with your emotions.

Every book I try to check out has a 3 month to 3 year wait-list. Not exactly a convenient way to read.

Can you blame them, though? I can’t think of a single person speaking for young men who is also widely accepted by the liberal left - or however you want to define the "good guys."

There are plenty of social media personalities with massive followings that specifically aim some or all of their contents at men with a positive vision of what men can be. I watch FD Signifier personally. There are also plenty of articles showcase positive male social media personalities with millions of followers. You should have done a 5 second Google search before saying something so easily debunked. You can't think of them because you are not looking.

Even here on Lemmy, anyone slightly deviating from the narrative is met with extreme hostility.

Welcome to social media, first day? You'll get that same extreme hostility in Andrew Tates comments if you deviate from being misogynistic.

It’s not that young men are naturally drawn to figures like Andrew Tate - they’re being pushed there.

You're right, just not in the way you're claiming. They are being pushed by social media algorithms that reward toxicity and simple answers. That's not the fault of the lefts "groupthink" it's on those companies.

Your mom, sister, and daughter most likely... /s

Also, these places:

• Îles des Saintes
• Marie-Galante
• La Désirade
• Guadeloupe
• Martinique
• French Guiana
• Saint Pierre and Miquelon
• Collectivity of Saint Martin
• Saint Barthélemy
• Clipperton Island
• Mayotte
• Réunion
• Wallis and Futuna

I mean, we're going on no information but one data point. Certainly hr is up there on odds to have some issues. But I'm at a work place were people generally get along well.

I'm not sure id have a problem with any of these honestly.

Things are still good for me, weird and increasingly concerned for the state of society, but presently still good. One can still work on making their own life and the life of those around you better as the world goes to shit. Increasingly trying to get more involved in the world to be one of the helpers but it's hard to know what organizations will need the most help locally.

And only way to get there is to spend some serious time on studying and working hard.

Naw, you just need a skill that's in high demand with low amount of qualified or interested individuals. You had it right in the first half. I make decent money and learned everything on the job. I was just willing to do boring data and implementation work that others seem to shy away from.

India is often dishonest with their data. Many politicians will lie to save face. But even if the numbers are "real", it's worth asking yourself what they are considering a home. Plenty of people live in scrap houses on land they don't own, are they "homeowners" in this data. India has squatters rights, if they can't be removed from someone else's property they've lived in for decades are they "homeowners" in this data? If someone's has a live in servant who has a separated house on their property, are they "homeowners"? My guess is that india is defining homeowners very loosely.

High interest debt is an emergency. Anything in the emergency category gets paid first. High interest debt is a trap, you can't hope to meet any other goal in life if you don't take care of that first.

For anyone with stable income, only debt who's interest rate is at or above the potential interest you would earn investments should be paid down first. Any debt at a rate lower than you stand to earn, should be paid over time. Any debt lower than the rate of inflation should be paid as slow as the terms allow without penalty.

So my order of priority is: high interest debt>emergency fund>tax deferred investing>ira and investing>low interest debt>even more cash holding>debt below inflation.

I've just been calling self defense, because that's what it was.

I'll never buy a Samsung again absolutely irritating phones. I've had 2 nearly flawless pixel phones. Even if this doesn't last 5 years, I'm not going back to endless bloatware programs that enshitify the Samsung. If I leave pixel it would be for something like fairphone.

Tbf, this is probably regional. I'm in the Midwest and noodle has always been limited to long string like pasta. Everything else is pasta.

I got mine around release, which means it's 3 years 2 months, no issues so far.

My guess is that these people were simply absent from the vote. If they scheduled the vote for an impractical time that would explain most of this.

Most places had some type of shelter in place orders for a period of time that was difficult for people to handle. I never thought your comment was anti-vax.

Here's the thing, it was a global pandemic, any decision a government made was only going to mitigate disaster, not prevent it entirely. Either a lot of people died or a lot of people had a really difficult time. I tend to think preventing deaths comes first. If your argument is NZ wasn't flawless in their handling of the pandemic response, sure, no one was. But they did a better job than almost any other country. Zero countries had a satisfied populous after the pandemic. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. You'll learn from it and hopefully do even better next time.

Here's some perspective, in the US we had more people die in the pandemic than any other single event in American history. More than WWII, more than the Spanish flu, more than the civil war, etc. The damage to our psyche from all that death, far exceeds 4 months in lockdowns and vaccine mandates. Over 1 million dead here, be grateful your country at least sought to keep you alive.