Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MA
Posts
0
Comments
42
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I get your point and I believe people with a disability should get a sitting seat for the same price.

    However, this can actually reduce the price for the sitting seat as well. As now more people will be able to fit in the airplane. Meaning that more people can share the costs of the plane. The whole goal of this is to be able to offer lower prices by lowering the costs.

    In countries with a high amount of competition this is a good thing, of course in places where there isn't you already have a situation in place where you are already being screwed, and then something such as this won't help.

  • Yea generally electronics is depreciated every 3 to 5 years. But I can imagine that after 3 years of children usage they are done for. That aside though, I think what you would be more looking for is a fair tax system.

    What I think that the problem with local property taxes is that if a city relies on it too much to pay for everything then this causes too many issues. For a poor city this could mean that if they don't increase the taxes they can't afford basic school care which people expect. So they moved to riched areas who can provide that. Or they move because of the higher taxes. This in turn lowers the property value and decreases the taxes further. Which in turn increases the problem.

    So I believe the educational budget should be provided by the central government so the same kind of quality in schools is given nationwide. This can of course be applied to other costs a city is making.

    In addition to this I think a property tax should be progressive and link to your overall assets. If you just own one house and you don't have any more assets. Then why should you be taxed as much as somebody who owns a lot more (of course if the house is 2m and you're living of social security it is a different story. L

  • Out of curiosity, for the first one. Would it have been possible to use that dirt on your boss to stay at the company? Of course I can imagine you just don't want to work for a company where you'd have to do such things in order to stay with the company in the first place.

  • The Green Party, maybe. Jill Stein, with the stuff she's been saying I am not quite sure if she would actually present your views better or if she's an actual competent leader. Of course you can have the question of the best of the worst, but then still I'm not sure if she compares well.

  • Whether they directly pass the costs or indirectly, these are still costs made by the seller. In other words either the costs are passed on by the credit card customers or simply all customers. Somebody has to pay for the costs and in the end the seller has to make some profit to survive.

  • The biggest problem I have with the 45$ is not for me buying it but it makes it very difficult to convince most of my friends to buy it just to try it out. And multiplayer does make this game much nicer.