M0oP0o @ M0oP0o @mander.xyz

Posts

64

Comments

1,862

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Its funny (and terrifying) that people, even professionals don't understand how the lie machine works.

Its like dems want to get stomped on

They did the same for me when my mother passed (no AI, just assholes though).

If its as light as the first one, all I can say is "YARRRG"

Well yeah, when ai started to give people info so wrong it cost the companies money this was going to happen.

Oh I know! Those checks and balances start working!

Any day now, annnnnny day.

It does seem the power of the judiciary will be challenged quite soon.

I think that happened some time ago.

Its the end state for a two party system I think. At this point there is not much attempt to run a campaign on policy or plan, just guilt flinging and excuses while both teams say don't vote for the other guys as they are evil.

Sure, but others can do that. Its a very stupid thing to do as a political party however.

Ha, you downvoted me. Ironic.

Oh and yes the votes do effect visabilty on Lemmy. Some ways of interfacing with lemmy also allow you to see user totals. But that is not the value of votes, the value is in the feedback and interaction on comments.

And in interesting times no less!

I think it also has a lot to do with people in the states just not wanting to know the truth of exactly how far gone their empire really is. I often hear that info silos are at fault but people willingly put themselves into those silos.

We are in the exciting sort of times they talk about in history books, and I am starting to understand that most people actively avoid admitting it.

And wildly dishonest to try and spin every campaign as having some choice on whether or not to deploy violence. To top it off, the flat out writing off of all unsuccessful non-violent campaigns as if they don't matter (even though most failed campaigns of these types result in people in cells regardless of if violence was employed or not)

They matter to just about everyone not on hexbear (for them it really matters but they tell us it does not).

Yeah, It is wild we still mostly have people talk about the law as if it currently applies in the us for the ruling group.

And unless they have very good parameters there have to be countless non-violent and ineffective campaigns.

If you did this as a ratio of failures over success the non-violent numbers would be sky high compared to the violent ones, the rate of failure would indicate violence is the way.

This whole thing seems like a really wordy way of saying "don't resist".

...all violent and nonviolent campaigns from 1900 to 2006 that resulted in the overthrow of a government or in territorial liberation. They created a data set of 323 mass actions.

323, in over 100 years. And they are exuding campaigns that did not work? I would assume there have been 10s of thousands of protests in that time that where non-violent and also ineffective. Why are they not included? What would make a campaign go from non-violent to violent? What constitutes a campaign, is it non-violent in whole or only part? I would check but I need to buy their book.

I can not even think of any movement that resulted in territorial or government change that did not involve some form of violence. This study does not seem to pass the sniff test.

Ehh seems like a stretch, have to assume too many things.

You hope for immortal troops to occupy us cities? I guess you like a challenge.