Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LU
Posts
0
Comments
168
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • So he hopes the world has forgotten what he said by then. 2 weeks is Trump's tell - either he doesn't want to commit, or he has no idea what's going on, either way in two weeks he hopes everybody has moved on and forgotten.

  • There are similar documents you can find online and they all look pretty similar, from comparing them, I'd say the document itself is authentic, although that tells us nothing but that the pdf does come from a lab that does drug testing and that it has his name on it. We don't know if it was his urine, or if he paid to have a clean report or anything the like.

  • If you only consume occasionally pretty much all of those substances are only testable 1-3 days after consuming them, if you're a regular user it's usually between 5-7 days maximum.

    As a regular user Ketamine could be tested up to 14 days in your urine. THC has the longest timeframe with up to 60 days when you use regularly.

  • Lol everything he has done in these lawsuits was for the sole purpose to hide his money.

    5 different corporate representatives were sent and the court ruled every single testimony of those as non responsive to discovery. The last corporate rep to testify was a hired outside lawyer with no experience in civil law, no familiarity with Texas law and had no experience in financial matters. Why would you send someone as your corporate representative, who has no idea what's going on, or any experience in relevant fields? To obscure the process of discovery and to hide the money.

  • For real. My father was a gynecologist and always said - "I need their file to remember their names, why would I remember their genitals?"

    And from a business standpoint it would be very bad practice to talk about that stuff, if it comes out people are less likely to trust you.

  • "Interesting, may I see?" And when they hold their wrist up to you, inspect it closely, then lick it, make some faces like a wine connoisseur, shake your head and say :"It's fake" turn around and disengage.

  • Basic troubleshooting and reasoning.

    That drives me nuts sometimes. Like even professionals sometimes seem unable to do basic troubleshooting. I work in live music, I am not a tech/engineer but have done a lot of tech work on and around stages.

    Simple stuff like - one speaker is not giving a signal, two techs are unable to identify the fault for over 20 min. I observe for a bit, they check the console, they check the speaker, they check the power supply.

    And I, half joking, ask - have you switched sides already? Both look at me like they don't understand my question, I walk over to the signal line for the PA, unplug them both, plug the left side into the right signal and vice versa on the other side - the problem moves from one speaker to the other, so it has to be a faulty cable. I was so baffled by that.

    WHY IS THAT NOT THE FIRST THING YOU DO????? It takes seconds!

    Or a wireless in-ear system has weird noises in the signal, I suggest to switch the frequency, the old tech grunts at me that he has already done that, I check and he moved the frequency like 10mhz. I suggest to move to a totally different frequency range and he gets rude so I go somewhere else. Half an hour later it turns out I was right. Why do you fuck around with firmware and shit before you do something simpler and quicker?

  • TLDR: Hard disagree on almost anything you just said

    Well historically it is not a terrible system, it is very stable and tends to not self implode regularly like democracy does.

    Yeah if you ignore for example wars of succession, because of incestuous family ties, arbitrary rule, repression and exploitation of its citizens, one could call it stable... Although the escalation and tyranny unfortunately are baked into the system.

    if you look at monarchies historically they tried very very hard to avoid having rebellions in their hands and usually worked in the interest of the nation, as the interest of the nation was the interest of the monarch.

    Have you ever read history books? Sure some rulers may have had that kind of view but theres also plenty of megalomaniacal, terribly violent and unjust rulers in those big ol books of history. And since it is an imposed rule of tyranny there's really only violence to get rid of an unjust ruler, you know a neat thing about democracy? Violence is the last resort to getting rid of rulers because we can vote! Crazy right?

    So if a democratic nation seems headed towards anti democratic rule, it would seem to me that a better goal would be to install a monarchy instead of a fascist.

    In that case- what's the fucking difference? Oh, to avoid an autocracy let's install an autocracy with cherry flavor... Great?