You can try to rationalize it all you want, bottom line is people don't have money to buy $80 games these days. Those people aren't going to the movies either.
I bought a rug that I've gotten years of value out of, should it have been thousands of dollars then? The idea that time used is how you measure value is flawed.
Edit: look what popped up on my feed, so looks like it's not just me
The force streamers and people who cover Nintendo to pay them, because word of mouth isn't enough. They need money.
They have and continue to directly or aid in the effort to patten basic game mechanics.
They refuse to participate in cross play functionality often.
They kill fan projects because fuck you for liking our games and bringing more attention to them I guess.
They lock games away forever, not rereleasing and killing mods aggressively. Actively killing gaming history.
A company doesn't have to be my friend. But when they are actively attacking people who express love for their product you eventually stop loving the product.
Don't forget, you see way less Nintendo gaming videos and streamers. Because they are greedy and want a cut of what is made. They're not happy with the good word of mouth, they NEED to get paid.
Also look at this shit with PalWorld. Working to retroactively patten very basic game mechanics because a franchise that refused to evolve got beat by the new kids.
Cool. And Sony can sell to PS and PC, same with Xbox. They have two markets, one that they don't have to support with hardware. They can also make games that look nice and run nice because they have much better hardware. Plus they actually do cross play with each other, making bigger player pools for match making and such.
We're not talking about consoles sold. I'm talking about game choice and experience. If you want to look at how you can play the games, there are a few more PCs than Switches sold.
Oh I get it. We made the jump from Google Cloud to AWS, and I'm sure there are companies that are even more vendor locked. But a good example of what people can do when they don't have a choice is the new PCI 4.0 roll out that has cost companies millions they wouldn't spend unless made to do so. Will it be a mountain to climb and cost a ton, yeah, but change in the right direction isn't always easy.
I'm with you, it will be hard, and they need a good system for extensions and the like, with a reasonable time line. But this is good change IMO, even if it's painful.
This is why you give notice; this isn't an overnight thing. If anything, this would help strengthen and decentralize hosting platforms while giving a huge amount of business to companies to help them migrate. I think the real shake is going to be those locked into provide IP like Redshift or Fargate.
Man I've just forgotten about Nintendo at this point. Microsoft and Sony get that exclusives aren't working when people don't have enough money to buy every system anymore. I see Nintendo as a niche console with a handful of games. There's just not enough to justify buying one, and I grew up on Zelda and Metroid. I love them, but it's not worth buying another console for a few high priced games with questionable performance.
So you're asking me to feel bad, for the richest person on Earth. After he just harmed a ton of people and damaged our country.... All because he has slightly less money, the difference of which no average person could ever dream of?
No, you just don't understand tariffs. I think about other countries a lot, like how they have to pay us, like so much money. We're all going to be rich.
Unions are rare here and trying to organize anything just gets you fired and jobless. Plus people are struggling just to eat, they can't all strike. It's really not that simple.
I live in Utah, it's about 90% people cheering at Trump and 10% very polite demonstrations against the right that are highly criticized. Feels so muted here.
I get that you like it for historical accuracy but I'm just saying it wasn't there. The link I gave shows how it never was. It never was accurate man. AC Shadows is just more if the same, not some departure from it.
Yasuke isn't special. They've done this with tons of people, they did it with Cleopatra for instance. They did it with lots of real people, just look at that link that breaks it down.
It's not missing the point like you claim. It's you applying an expectation of realism on a series that never had it.
it's inconsistent with Ubisoft's previous approach of keeping the events and characters as true to history as good gameplay would allow
In pervious games they mention DaVinci and his creations for the Assassin's. He was a real person. But he didn't craft weapons for a league of Assassin's. Plenty of their games have historical figures, acting like this is the first one to take liberties is silly.
but there should maybe be a disclaimer that Yasuke's real role in history is not truly known, but they chose the most fun version of events, even if it's likely untrue.
As they have done with many events and figures in past games. Someone has already taken the time to break this down in great detail. The TL;DR is they never had historical accuracy like you seem to think, ever.
Well read the post again. One girl was furious that raunchy texts were shared. Looks like we've solved the mystery lol.
But I'm not out here making a legal argument. I'm saying sharing that stuff without consent isn't OK, morally. You don't have to be god to look at something like that and have the guts to say something.
Sorry, compromising photos and messages if we want to be pedantic. If you're nit picking the nuance ls of the type of private content shared without someone's consent you've already lost.
You can try to rationalize it all you want, bottom line is people don't have money to buy $80 games these days. Those people aren't going to the movies either.
I bought a rug that I've gotten years of value out of, should it have been thousands of dollars then? The idea that time used is how you measure value is flawed.
Edit: look what popped up on my feed, so looks like it's not just me
https://tech.yahoo.com/gaming/articles/former-blizzard-boss-says-hard-090054442.html