Liam Mayfair @ LiamMayfair @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

1

Comments

166

Joined

2 yr. ago

This hits the nail right on the head. The point of cloud services is to take away all the overheads of building and delivering software solutions that have nothing to do with the actual business problem I'm trying to solve.

If I want to get a new product to market, I want to spend most of my time making my core product better, more marketable, more efficient. I don't want to divert time and resources to just keep the lights on, like having to hire a whole bunch of people whose only jobs is to provision and manage servers and IT infrastructure (or nurse a Kubernetes cluster for that matter). Managing Kubernetes or physical tin servers is not what my business is about. All this tech infrastructure is a means to an end, not the end itself.

That's why cloud services is such a cost efficient proposition for 98% businesses. Hell, if I could run everything using a serverless model (not always possible or cost effective) I'd do it gladly.

I was using the Signal "notes to self" too when taking notes during talks and conferences. Taking quick pictures of the slides in context was also a key thing for me. Exporting these unstructured notes into a useful notes archive is a pain as you say, especially if there is media too.

I caught myself doing this so often that I ended up building myself an app for this specific workflow. It's rather simple, just an MVP if you will, but it works well for me. Taking notes works exactly like Signal's "note to self" but it has some QoL stuff on top of that like separate notebooks and exporting notes and pictures to a single PDF archive. I can then import the PDF archive into Notion, which is my main notes repository. Notion can now parse PDF files and import them as regular Notion pages, which closes the loop for me rather nicely. YMMV ofc

I haven't published it to any app stores yet (might do in the future) but the source code is available here if you're technically savvy and happy to build and install it yourself.

electrons be vibin

QQ what do you guys think would be the last straw for her? I'd love to know all the deets

kthxbye

snake_case_ftw

Yeah, but there are degrees of vulnerability. Otherwise, things like password strength or MFA wouldn't matter.

If all your passwords are fully random, then that's one less weakness that can be exploited. People can't make educated guesses about your passwords just from analysing your social media profiles and history, e.g. if you post a lot about Star Wars, it's more likely your passwords could contain a Star Wars reference.

That system is vulnerable to social engineering attacks. If hackers found out all their favourite things that lead to the core part of the password, guessing the prefix wouldn't be that hard. Also, what would your friend do if one of these passwords got compromised and had to change it? Would he just add a 1 to the site-specific part of the password?

CHOCOLATE RAAAAAAAIIIIN 🎶🎶🎶

https://youtu.be/EwTZ2xpQwpA

where my boxxy fans at

Ah, a fellow dramatic connoisseur.

Actually, it's a prairie dog.

Source: obsessed over the damn meme for months, when the lifespan of a meme was measured in months, not days.

Lol

Living in a perpetual #4

Sure, on their own, but are they part of any defence treaties like NATO or have alliances with other countries strong enough to drag them into this conflict with Pakistan and start a world war?

But you can validate the business rules with the people that make them: the business or your users?

I get some companies do things pretty fucking backwards and QA as a separate function is harmful, pointless and should be abandoned.

However, I don't see how anyone from QA is going to physically stop your from testing and validating your code. As a dev, you could be more proactive in understanding what you're building, why you're building it, and how to make sure it works and it does what your stakeholders/users need it to do.

If you don't, then refer to OP's post.

Yes they would, in theory, because those prosthetics she's wearing were NHS-funded. I can see the waitlist to get ones like those being pretty fucking long though but hey, what NHS waitlist is not pretty fuck long these days anyway

ITT people claiming this could be a WW3 starter. Even if India engaged Pakistan militarily, I fail to see how that would lead to anything larger than a localised conflict.

Like, neither country is geopolitically significant enough for any major players to care at that level. Sure, India getting bogged down in war could affect supply chains around the world, but would any of the heavyweights like US, China, Russia or a semi-relevant NATO country think that would be worth their involvement? If Russia being on year 11 of their military invasion of a NATO-bordering country hasn't sparked a world war yet, I don't see how this would either.

That's a fun way to do it.

Only one? All vape shops are money laundering fronts, until proven otherwise.