LarmyOfLone @ LarmyOfLone @lemm.ee

Posts

1

Comments

801

Joined

1 yr. ago

Personally I'm more interested in foam printing, which allows large scale plastic printing of insulated structures. For single story bungalows that should be just fine and transport of the building materials easy. Something like (recycled) PET foam printing should be possible. The printer would be more lightweight than concrete printing too. You could 3D print a clean circumference with PET filament first and then fill in with PET foam. Or you could have tool changing and mill down the irregular foam. And you can recycle the whole 3D print later too.

The nyt article has a good one

This comes a bit down to utilitarianism vs ethics based on principles. But that's a lie, it's really about who has power.

I'm just watching a video by Majority Report where he talks about the question "Why is democracy is good" which the Democrats sort of fucked up in the election. And he makes a pretty painful point that it's a "show me, don't tell me" question. If you live in a democracy and constantly exploited, overworked, fucked over, in terror of economic hardship or terror attacks, harassed by police, then what is the point? What is the benefit? I'm not making the point that democracy is bad, but that a shell of a democracy, a fake, is leading especially the "dirtbag left" to adopt a pretty hostile posture.

So what is the actual quality of life in China vs the USA? What are the actual material benefits looking at living in an apartment, working, raising children and living a peaceful life?

How do YOU know that life in China isn't actually better and people more happy than in the USA? I don't believe that is true but it's a valid question. Of course China has massive problems and corruption and abuses. But there are a billion people there that were on a medieval level after WWII. The CCP has massively invested in e.g. education and healthcare and infrastructure.

Or compare quality of life in China vs democratic India. Similar can be said about Iran, 55% of University graduates were women. But it's painted as black and white.

Sure you have freedom of speech with the means of communication owned and controlled by the oligarchs. And you can say whatever you want on reddit and get downvoted to hell - which goes to my previous point, that the propaganda is so internalized and polarized now that you don't need threats of state violence to keep the population in check.

So those opinions are not just for fun. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer is an aphorism that is leading the west inevitably towards fascism. So all the "posturing" about how superior our principles and freedums are is just... well it's a delusion. It's happening right now. They are stealing your future right now and there is nothing you can do because they control the media.

But still the socialists are completely rejected and banned from the largest lemmy instances.

The problem is that over the last decade any nuanced opinions on those topics has become less and less "politically correct". And that is the correct term, anyone who isn't politically correct and in line with the liberal mainstream opinion (= imperialist propaganda by the US state department and think tanks) must by definition by a paid shills of Putin, China or Trump. There are those people of course, but the dynamic has become more and more polarized and steeped in conspiratorial thinking. And that is by "design". It's profitable and it serves the US imperial agenda and it's easier to avoids the frustration of talking to trolls and fascists - just paint everyone of a different opinion with the same brush.

I mean you can't even talk about talking about it, like not seeing those people as anything but "assholes". The range of allowable opinions has drastically narrowed. It's not even liberal in the modern sense of the word. People are too scared to be liberal any more.

You must live in a alternative reality that you think that wasn't a joke! Or you just pretend to not know that was a joke to argue in bad faith and insult me. This is the real Trump derangement syndrome right here.

Just nationalize amazon haha

The actual left wing, the something socialists something are partly on hexbear.org and lemmygrad.ml. And they are called tankies and blocked on lemmy.world. So how left wing can most people here be? The thing is that "left" has become synonymous with (neo)liberal values. Like there doesn't have to be a free, independent press or social media and them being owned by capitalists is just fine.

I recently thought about what I'm missing, and came up with something rather complicated (sorry, nothing simple haha)

Basically I'm often compiling information in markdown text files. But images are still web hosted. Sometimes I use spreadsheets and wish I could do simple additions in markdown tables. Or I use bookmarks, but know websites will go down and wish I could just "backup" any website in a compact file and organize it without mucking around with files. Zotero does this partly. I also use "SingleFile" to save websites but it would be nice if it was something semi-compatible to web-archive. Or maybe just save a stripped down version of an article like you see in "reader view" on Firefox. And of course usable in both desktop and mobile.

I do think Project Jupyter does something like this and there are also other note taking apps.

Overall the state of computer science in 2025 is still deplorable. The very basics of storing data still don't have good solutions.

Take a look at how the US facilitates regime change. It's always extra-legal. If you can't even imagine it, then it's just a pathetic and empty show of frustration. And that's on the people of the USA (and the media of course that manipulates and indoctrinates them).

Thanks, those statistics are definitely more extreme than I imagined. I still would imagine that smartphone or TV you'd get more "new product review" shows because there is a demand and it's (somtimes) cheap content to make.

Well it's hard to imagine a world without advertising and just speculation, but there are a lot of videos on youtube and articles about new products. And stuff that is interesting would get upvotes, get shared and be trending. Of course there would need to be a different monetization scheme for youtubers.

What the heck are you talking about?

Well not wrong but without clear demands there can be not even a chance for anything to happen. Then it's just a big angry party. So something like call for new election. Because this one was fraud based on lies and the current administration is engaged in treason / economic terrorism.

Their demands seem to be as feeble they might as well not exist. So the mass protests might not exist as well. Hands off bla bla lol, might as well send a sternly written letter haha. "Oh please sir, could you possibly be less rough with me?!"

I heard that the USA has been involved in illegal regime change in other countries 62 times. Sixty two times! Overthrowing quite a few democracies too. But for the US this seems unthinkable still, even for mother jones. A simple demand like the Trump administration to step down and call for new elections seems to be nowhere to be found.

PATHETIC ATTEMPT AT REVOLUTION!

Yeah with advances in software and AI you could also manage the economy much more efficient and in real time than the old "planned economy". Shortages and problems could be handled quickly. With crowd funding you could also have banks providing funds for new enterprises (collectives / coops) by people voting democratically on what to approve.

The issue is that I haven't seen any serious work on improving socialism, which most socialists seem to think is a heretical concept. So there is a lack of valid alternatives to capitalism that people can imagine. And the power balance and technology for propaganda to control the population and weaponry and tactics the stage manage protests has advanced too.

And then there is the issue that no matter what ideology and system, those who desire power or wealth above anything else are more likely to attain it, and we haven't yet found good antibodies to this fundamental problem of managing power. Or even know about it.

Conglomerates spend oodles of money on advertising to maintain their brands as well. They have to. Ban on advertising would dramatically shift the balance of power. More innovating and better products can come to market without needing as much capital. You'd still have channels to review and inform about new products, which would now be a (more) fair competition.

Advertising might be similarly harmful as lead in drinking water.

Do rural jokels not have phones already? It's not like you wouldn't have product announcements and news and forum discussing it.

Online stores would be the exact wrong place imho. Take amazon, it become a outdated and rotten because of advertising changing the ranking and fake reviews and endless duplicates of items. There is also a lack of advancement for filtering. You'd want more trustworthy reviews, information, measurements and also more community functions to help find what you really need. Advertising would run counter to all of that.

I think you're drawing the wrong conclusions. Currently you need a lot of capital to market a new product. That shifts the balance of power away from entrepreneurs towards the capitalists. Marketing also has a larger impact on profits than engineering, which leads to non-engineers to gain more promotions and power.

Instead we could have reviews, testing institutions, forums where people exchange opinions. And "pay for play" would be illegal fraud. But there would be constant demand to learn and compare the quality of products, once the focus on emotional manipulation is gone.

And existing brands from conglomerates spend oodles of money to maintain their brands, so you would immediately see a shift in power towards entrepreneurs and new and better products. You'd gain far more than you'd loose.

Another issue is that we are hyperstimulating consumerism which has not just negative effects, but leads to existential risk now.