Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LA
Posts
1
Comments
801
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Yeah, I'm just too lazy to reinstall and copy over my settings to VSCodium.

    Supporting open source projects by small teams has been the only good thing MS has ever done. Imagine if MS would even partly open sourced part of windows. Like there are bugs in explorer for 3 decades that just don't get fixed lol. And then there still would be bloat and shitty things, but it still would be better.

  • Wait, thorium reactors can be build small enough to fit in shipping containers? That would be incredible. I know they are now working on SMR reactors with helium as coolant that are very safe because nothing is under extreme pressure and explode even if there is a meltdown. Reading on wiki it seems there is a SMR with thorium fuel cycle, but EDIT: Copenhagen atomics really is building a thorium molten salt reactor that is safe from meltdown!

  • I'd love to know the cost of thorium reactors vs some experimental grid level battery technology with solar or wind. Like liquid metal batteries made out of dirt cheap materials, or liquid flow batteries. I'm pro nuclear, but it's weird that there hasn't been much progress in scalable cheap grid storage.

  • It’s not puppet masters pulling strings on a marionette. It’s gardeners watching the fruits of their labor grow.

    Interesting analogy. To spin this further, who allowed malicious gardeners to grow poisonous mushrooms here in our community garden? We largely abdicated the power of the state and government to the economic bureaucracy and ignored profit driven news and social media.

  • You bring up some interesting points about the billionaires and their desire about a new world order (dark enlightenment, longtermism etc) in the US, those who hold the most power. But how in the world do you square that with this:

    Anyone who claims that Russia is NOT behind all of this is either Russian, a traitor, or stupid.

    So are the billionaires also controlled by Putin? How can both be true? Or do you think Putin holds more influence over US elections that the US billionaires and tech bros do?

    PS: Let me make my point clearer: I don't doubt that Putin helped Trump and sow discord in the US - but who is to blame for allowing this? These are cheap things to do for any foreign actor now because we allowed to run news and social media purely for profit. If greed is good, nothing but money matters, why wouldn't those companies make advertising deals bad actors? So blaming Putin for this is propaganda itself, because it disguises the actual causes of the democratic backsliding which started way before Trump, and would have happened despite Trump.

  • But the 63 per cent of the German people who expressed their opposition to Hitler were much too divided and shortsighted to

    lucky if Europe and the rest of “the West” survive China/Russia expansion

    So who is the enemy we should focus on? Is it Trump? Is it Putler/China? Neoliberal and austerity policies of both parties that created the fertile ground for neofascism?

    The OP article is about Trump and US economic policy, and I replied to a comment that segways away from "stopping the nazis" and instead focuses on the evil "Putler".

    Yeah the parallels to weimar are there, but it's that you can't see them - you are the ones who distract with this conspiracy theory that Trump is somehow Putin's asset or his creation. It's like saying that Hitler is Stalin's puppet because they want to divide up Poland (Ukraine) - just because they help each other out it's not reasonable to start persecuting the socialists - which they did and do now! (Tankies bad, defederate).

  • The issue isn't Trump. Trump should be in a mental institution. The issue is that we build a world that "allows" for such people to gain power. The issue is that our news and social media allow a (very real) Russian psyop. But it's not just the Russians. It also came from special interests like fossil fuel, China, and formerly Ukraine too.

    You're loudly yelling at the dog tearing up the flower beds, instead you should be yelling at those who let the dogs out.

    But instead of talking about that, we're talking about the latest bullshit that is being pumped into the ether. Stop the shit-factory. Nationalize the news and social media and turn them into cooperatives run by the workers. Arrest the billionaires. Take the power back. Of course now it's too late for that, thanks Obama.

    But this isn't even thinkable for the majority. Hence you seek some bad guy you can blame.

  • There is no mastermind or master plan. If you think Trump is a Russian asset then you've fallen for conspiracy theory and you yourself live in a "post-truth" fantasy. Whatever Trump is, he's not someone who can be handled (except by playing on his megalomania). If you don't understand that yet, and pretend otherwise, you're just adding to the noise.

    Similarily, that Foundations of Geopolitics is an interesting "cookbook" but it's just that. Russia exploits glaring weaknesses in our neoliberal society by simply buying their way into social media. Any rational country would prevent news or social media to be owned by oligarchs, spew lies for profit and and generally being open to the highest bidder. The US has failed to get money out of politics and media. And that is a result of the neoliberal world order, so - thanks Obama and all those who came before him.

    The liberal mindset has been poisoned since 2016 to think there is some big enemy like Russia or China, that there is only black and white, good or evil.

  • About your example: You know you could "rightfully" call out all the US mainstream news papers US imperialist and fascist propaganda and owned by the oligarchs? And then endlessly repeat that.

    So "just asking" why anybody would read any article that is obviously from another geopolitical rival is "just presuming" that US news papers are neutral and trustworthy in comparison. And that is fascist speech which is fascist recruitment. Parsing RT doesn't make you pro-Russia.

  • That's a very good take too. I just saw this video Why Justice for Ukraine AND Russia Goes Through South Africa which has another interesting take - that admission of guilt and confessing the truth towards the victim is sometimes better for reconciliation than a trial that is about the court prosecuting and the accused defending, denying and finding excuses. But I doubt that either is realistic in the near future.

  • It's sort of surprising that this article gets so much backlash, since it's just a rehash of the NYT article with a more critical analysis of the historical facts. And those facts aren't even really something new - at least it was all suspected, now a bit more confirmed, or something the mainstream would see as problematic.

    But I guess they can't attack the facts presented by the venerable NYT so they take it out on the "far left" and "fringe" Aaron Mate.

    At this point, I just want to see China arming Panama or Mexico or Venezuela to the hilt with modern weaponry, missiles and drones, and then when the USA invades them helps with constant logistics and satellite information of "points of interests". We'll see how the whole mainstream would defend this because they just had to liberate the poor people oppressed by those regimes there. That would be the equivalent to what the US, Nato and EU have been doing. Although I doubt China has any interest in such funny games.

  • So you think countries should recognize and punish themselves for “being the bad guys”?

    I think people and journalists should be educated and informed so they can see it for the theater it is. If the people of a democracy can't see the evil their own countries have been doing or do not have the means to change anything, then those leaders pointing the fingers at others for the same shit becomes nothing but a distraction.

  • This is just propaganda - how objective will this tribunal be when you know what kind of "wars of aggression" the UK, Israel or the US have done and are still doing?

    And no this is not whataboutism - it's about truthfulness and moral standing. Invasion if Iraq and Afghanistan, decades of foreign policies, occupation and oppression of Palestinians, meddling and regime change of countries. If it's only a crime of aggression if the other side does it, then it's simply a farce or a show trial that will not prevent future crimes of aggression.

    You are first and foremost responsible for your own actions. And only then responsible for holding others responsible.