pewter @ Kolrami @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

329

Joined

2 yr. ago

Synchron has a similar technology and their death count appears to be lower than Neuralink's in animal trials. Unfortunately, this article doesn't actually show the death rate of the trials.

ISIS is saying it was them.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/islamic-state-releases-photo-alleged-attackers-behind-russia-shooting-2024-03-23/

This tracks. Lewis Hamilton hates driving if he's not racing.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/aug/08/lewis-hamilton-dislikes-driving-outside-of-f1-stressful

In a non-Euclidean space you can have values of pi that aren't even constant. The first that came to mind was the surface of a sphere. This is actually an interesting problem.

As it turns out, the enemy of your enemy isn't always your friend

In what ways is YouTube shorts different from tiktok?

Your wiki page is about crime, but there's also one about rape:

There was a rape statistics section in my link. I should've used an anchor tag so you could see it.

Reasons why it's likely lower: police refuse to register cases against specific persons or cases from specific people (Dalits), but far more will not be registered simply because the victims don't even try.

This doesn't explain why the number would be lower in Uttar Pradesh than the rest of India. In the absence of evidence there's no reason to believe that police corruption shouldn't happen in rural areas too.

But even when you try to account for that, there's still an aweful lot of scandals Coming out of Uttar Pradesh.

This doesn't appear to be true. When you account for population Uttar Pradesh has fewer rapes (and crimes in general) than India as a whole.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India_by_crime_rate

Also, it's incredibly low effort to cover it. There's no subscription plan for covering a webcam.

You just hit on the big difference. Your SO actually knows you so even in text she can probably get your sarcasm. I don't know anybody in this thread so I can't always honestly distinguish between some sarcastic comments and crazy ones. Some people are actually crazy.

Is the song title the prompt? Or all of the song's lyrics?

What's "it"? The fact that he was wearing the hat? If so, it's weird to talk to some stranger and just say "hey, check out my hat".

Good question. I don't have a good source, but this one guy tried to come up with a breakdown a few months ago and in parts alone he estimated $1529.

Inner and outer display including display lens: $840

Silicon content including M2 and R1 chips: $240

Sensors and cameras: $120

Battery: $18

Spatial Audio: $11

Housing, PCBS, cables, connectors, and packaging: $170

Assembly: $130

It aligns with the number in the article. The rest seems like a business decision.

Michigan is a state Biden won. If that being a dead heat is positive news for Democrats, that's not positive. Besides, the RCP average has Trump at +5.1

Meanwhile there is no likely voter screen on current polls,

Based on your numbers, you were looking at the Emerson College poll for Michigan. There's a Michigan-based poll of likely voters for only Michigan that has Trump leading 45 to 41.

And Trump has underperformed his polls in every race so far in the primaries.

The Republican primary has essentially been over since shortly after it began. I don't know if we can really glean anything from it. This isn't like Hillary vs Barack where it was actually contested and people thought they had to get to the primaries and vote.

And it's 9 months until the election.

This is a very fair point, but Biden is -2.1 right now. Biden was approximately +5.4 at this point last election. Clinton was +2.8. These are RCP numbers.

I looked at the graphs for the national aggregate polling too and Trump is generally doing much better than in either previous election. The race obviously isn't decided yet, but If I'm a DNC strategist I would be more than concerned because the electoral college does not structurally favor Democrats.

pretty far from catastrophic.

Fair. That was pretty hyperbolic.

Capable? Polling is a catastrophe for Democrats. 45 has a high probability of returning to the White House.

They should show a small, but representative sample of questions they gave it.

Also they should compare the scores to similarity scores for a flesh and blood smart human that answers the questions.

Good chatbots right now have great spelling and decent grammar. That already makes it not the worst insult.

This doesn't align with how well Republicans are polling nationally right now in general election matchups.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2024/president/2024GeneralElection.html#!

This should be extra concerning to Democrats and good news to Republicans because in recent elections when the electoral college has been close, Democrats were ahead in the popular vote.