Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @ Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,859

Joined

2 yr. ago

It smells wrong.

I was never sure if that was figurative or literal.

So why is a real “thinking” AI likely impossible? Because it’s bodiless. It has no senses, no flesh, no nerves, no pain, no pleasure.

This is not a good argument.

Bad intentions? The Chinese government Deepseek showed that the OpenAI emperor had no clothes.

Dude, you are the one inserting words like "freedom" trying to slide the conversation.

China is not worse , principally because worse is unmeasurable.

No one was talking about openness, we were talking about data collection.

The only way to ensure no data collection is to run locally, which requires openness.

You're comparing online models with local models.

Correct

Local OpenAI models are also private.

They don't exist, and privacy cannot be guaranteed.

Good thing no one said that. It's not just America either.

So you do think that.

Most countries are significantly more free than China (and Russia and North Korea),

The word used was "worse" which is highly subjective.

and if you don't believe that, you need to open your eyes.

Residents of "the land of the free" don't understand irony.

Where is the ChatGPT repository?

Then why are you asking binary questions about countries

Because a highly opinionated binary statement was made about China. I'm not saying China is better than the US. I'm saying it's not worse.

You asked "which countries".

Countries and LLM model providers associated with those countries.

• All openai data goes to the NSA
• Online deepseek data goes to the CCP. Local models stay private.

You can't possibly believe China is not much much worse than the US.

When it comes to AI models, China is streets ahead in openness.

But if you are introducing other factors, ask an Iranian what they prefer; money from China or bombs from the US and vassal states?

The only people believing that Americans are superior in everything are Americans.

One goal was to increase defense burden-sharing with allies. but withdraw from NATO wasn't a project goal.

There are also many others in US and worldwide.

We are comparing chatGPT and Deepseek.

China is worse when comparing many other factors

Again, not an opinion everyone agrees on. And this very much depends on which factors are cherry picked.

but if ALL you care about is whether the model weights are os,

If you want privacy then you need to run locally, and to run locally all you do care about is model weights.

then it is usually not decided by countries, but rather companies.

Not sure why this dimension is worth adding to the discussion.

I mean we can generally agree that China is worse.

Can we? Which country had open sourced it's models and weightings so that the LLM can be run locally and spyfree?

But if you turn it back on the conscious doesn't return. Electricity is the energy conscious runs on, but it's not consciousness.

Hang on. I've seen that tattoo!

That's what someone who doesn't understand magic would say.

Follow the spell incorrectly and that is indeed all you would get.

Presumably you have a limited number of wishes.

Who the hell sticks a bumper sticker anywhere but the bumper?

Can't proved they have been deleted and can't prove you don't have more.

Problem created.

The dob credential could verified and issued by anyone. But you may have more confidence in a government signature than a private company or known individual.

Zero Knowledge is more secure. Government signs a credential confirming date of birth and gives that to the citizen.

Citizen can then use that to create a proof they were born before date X. Verifier only sees the proof and the Government signature.

No need to trust 3rd party websites.

I want a quake rated home, which must be wood.

This isn't true in Japan.