Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @ Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,857

Joined

2 yr. ago

I expect all state apparatus to have impeccable records.

Golden Oreos are just shite Custard Cremes

North Europe probably.

Upgrading a computer is very different to adding a new sensor array all around the body.

I'm not saying upgrading older cars the only reason for excluding lidar, but I bet it was a large factor.

This statement works from anyone's PoV.

Technical debt.

If you promise self driving on all cars, but cars already on the road don't have lidar then no car has lidar.

Don't they mainly target Red states?

This censorship is clear evidence of anti-masochism.

There is a big difference between selling oil and gas and selling solar panels. One you sell continuously and the other you sell once.

I believe what you say. I don't believe that is what the article is saying.

I'm not attacking philosophical arguments between the 1950s and the 1980s.

I'm pointing out that the claim that consciousness must form inside a fleshy body is not supported by any evidence.

watched a guy weedwacking naked last time I was there

In case you were wondering, this is a weedwacker

There are so many fictional films referencing MKULTRA that people assume it is fiction.

I'm not saying it's less likely. I'm saying there is a completely different reason for deepseek to exist.

The philosopher has made an unproven assumption. An erroneously logical leap. Something an academic shouldn't do.

Just because everything we currently consider conscious has a physical presence, does not imply that consciousness requires a physical body.

It's hard to see that books argument from the Wikipedia entry, but I don't see it arguing that intelligence needs to have senses, flesh, nerves, pain and pleasure.

It's just saying computer algorithms are not what humans use for consciousness. Which seems a reasonable conclusion. It doesn't imply computers can't gain consciousness, or that they need flesh and senses to do so.

The point I'm trying to make is that I don't think the CCP cares about the users of deepseek mobile app when they already have an ocean of data from tiktok. That's the real trojan horse.

Mobile access to an LLM is a similarity. The big difference between chatgpt and deepseek is the open model weights.

It smells wrong.

I was never sure if that was figurative or literal.

So why is a real “thinking” AI likely impossible? Because it’s bodiless. It has no senses, no flesh, no nerves, no pain, no pleasure.

This is not a good argument.