Kissaki @ Kissaki @feddit.de

Posts

5

Comments

635

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes, exactly. A double negation.

The opposite of the opposite is the same again.

/edit: anecdotes and simplification are often a balancing act between between simplicity and (thorough) correctness. The opposite thing and enemy of enemy (in a two party premise) fit and practically correct for the Negation of the multiplication. It doesn't thoroughly represent the multiplication part. But I think the negation is what you were looking for?

Explain what exactly?

You can divide 2 apples between two people, or between four people, but you can't divide them between zero people. That premise doesn't make sense, the question is incomplete to be answerable.

By expanding our scale with another dimension (complex numbers in math) we expand the question. How do we add another dimension to the physical, practical anecdote? 🤔

Is it a leak if it's a necessary technical part to a functionality?

The main issue is that it's not obvious to non-technical users. They can't asses what sharing IP address means either though.

The reason Telegram leaks a user’s IP addresses during a call is that, by default, Telegram uses a peer-to-peer connection between callers “for better quality and reduced latency,” Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told TechCrunch.

“The downside of this is that it necessitates that both sides know the IP address of the other (since it is a direct connection). Unlike on other messengers, calls from those who are not your contact list will be routed through Telegram’s servers to obscure that,” Vaughn said.

To avoid leaking your IP address, you have to go to Telegram’s Settings > Privacy and Security > Calls, and then select “Never” in the Peer-to-Peer menu, as shown below.

Telegram defaults to using p2p for calls, for contacts only.

It's not a thorough privacy default, but otherwise seems fine to me. If you want p2p it needs to be enabled, and if you don't it needs to be disabled. No-contacts and no-calls receive no IP.

No

Those are on the website, not web notifications

I see it more as a personal question and intention than social or moral.

Given that guides exist, and you can force-unlock (Steam) achievements without installing a game, they're not a curated qualified badge system. There's no guarantees how someone achieved them.

That makes it a personal consideration, and decision how you want to design it for yourself.

Which is elevated by awareness and mindfulness. Not being victim to extrinsic motivation but making a decision on it and whether and how to achieve them, under which burden and help, broadly or achievement specifically.

As such, there should be no barriers. Guides make them accessible for more people.

It's how I intuitively read it too, even after decades of being exposed to tech, software, and licenses.

There's the OSI Open Source Definition, which is a free software definition.

I think the free terminology is clearer because free as in beer vs freedom is more obvious. Either it has a price or it doesn't. The Libre term is rather common alternative because of the ambiguity. The free as in beer or freedom is a common easy to understand explanation.

There's no such things for open source. In my subjective experience at least. "Source available" did not establish like Libre. Open is way more broadly ambiguous than free. And whether a license is open or open needs a full understanding and interpretation rather than only 'does it cost or can I use it for free.

Free is a dualist ambiguous differentiation. Open is broadly ambiguous and hard to verify.

How long has she been using it? It says

• she's two decades without hand, and now can use this
• this one used for years
• she has less pain issues now

So has she been using this for two decades? Some years but less?

Seems like they connected it after using more traditionals for a while?

Which limbs are you ready to cut off?

I think you missed their point. They pointed out the irony. Which is valid. They didn't explore viability of monetization.

And then you fall into that kind of toxic tone...

The most relevant paragraph:

Now, using a new way of linking the clocks with ultra-fast lasers, researchers have shown that different kinds of optical atomic clocks can be placed a few kilometres apart and still agree within 1 part in 10¹⁸. This is just as good as previous measurements with pairs of identical clocks a few hundred metres apart, but about a hundred times more precise than achieved before with different clocks or large distances.

I don't watch currently airing seasons. I wait for a season to complete before watching them.

I have two concerns for a general anime community:

1. I don't want to be spoiled - which is not always obviously evadeable on clips, images, and memes
2. I'm not interested in first-airing episode discussion threads - the number of episodes airing means other anime general discussion and content gets driven out/back

(I don't think I've seen that many episode discussion threads in my feed though(?).)

You missed my point. I wasn't saying AI is self-aware.

It’s just a stream of IF/THEN statements with no actual awareness of said art.

Just like your brain neurons.

You're comparing different things. That's not a valid, good-faith comparison.

Conscience arises from a complex system. Just like generative data does - to a different degree.

FF mobile currently has a very selected list of available extensions, which does not include it yet.

But that's about to change before the end of the year. FF mobile is finally opening up add on usability and distribution.

Why did you switch?

Why do you support them?

Why support them without disclosing reasons?

Isn't it reasoning that would make it OK or not OK?

Im talking about their Settlements and their military campaigns NOT about their government.

What does that even mean? Both of those are inherently political and driven from government. I don't see how you can separate them.

In total the researchers confirmed eight devices with backdoors installed—seven TV boxes, the T95, T95Z, T95MAX, X88, Q9, X12PLUS, and MXQ Pro 5G, and a tablet J5-W.

The other thing discussed is fraudulent android apps that have been removed from the play store.

It was trained on human text and interactions, so …

maybe that's a quite bad implication?

Windows 12? Did they ever explicitly revoke the "Windows 10 will be the last"?

I thought 11 was an exception die to the hardware requirements.

But I guess any big enough change can be a new reason for the next.