Does textise support what Reader mode doesn't? If reader mode can't determine the central content, does textise have more logic to so so?
Given the wording I also want to point out a website doesn't have to actively explicitly support reader mode. They only have to follow html website standards marking their content - a general accessibility approach too.
There are a lot of different views on it between people and EU institutions and they're having difficulties finding a compromise. After all this time and reduction of scope and severity, the one they have now still can't proceed because of how far apart they all are in their opinions, assessments, and positions.
And now that they started questioning the driving person about their press-reported links to the big scanning software lobby orgs, with questionable results, even more people will become skeptical.
My last experiences with Google were non-trivial privacy policy consent request popups that made me leave.
The one before was having to clean up my mother's laptop after she installed a popular FOSS program from a search result ad infested with ad and malware.
Yes, developing coping mechanisms can be helpful and fruitful.
Other mental mechanisms were useful in the evolutionary past, or are useful in some cases, but not others.
Anxiety can be useful and important in selective situations. But when it generalized or fears the non issue it becomes unhelpful or problematic. When it has negative impact on us without usefulness we call it a disorder.
Therapy can help you manage burdens, and most importantly, manage and ease the influence they have over you(r) mental.
It's not about solving practical issues that can't be solved. It's about how to approach, view, accept, and handle them.
Having mental burdens doesn't help resolving the unsolvable. In du cases the mental mechanisms are not helpful but detrimental. Easing them can improve both subjective and objective, practical situations.
When users open and wait for the Chrome download to begin, Microsoft opens a sidebar and presents users with a poll that interrogates users on why they think they need another browser.
An optional survey in a sidebar that doesn't block anything is not an interogation or demand. It's a question, a request for information.
Their aggressive wording is disingenuous sensationalism.
A good article or criticism would be fair in wording and criticize Microsofts activity for what they do, not lie to bait.
asked/answers from one month ago: Non Americans, what province is the "Alabama" of your country?