Kill_John_Lennon @ Kill_John_Lennon @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

22

Joined

2 yr. ago

All of these shortcomings are true, yet none one of them are a valid excuse for not voting for the lesser of two evils, I don t understand how this is so hard to grasp for some people. Accusing the abstentionists for what they have caused doesn't imply absolving Biden of anything.

Don’t you need to get the bullet out before patching them up? I don’t remember ever seeing a movie where it’s implied that digging the bullet out is sufficient, only that it’s a necessary step.

No we’re not

Oh I have absolutely no social anxiety, I just prefer to keep what I’m buying to myself when I can, rubber or not.

I just like the feeling of privacy. When the staff redirects customers to the cashiers because there's less queue than at the self checkout, I pretend not to hear with my headphones on.

Oh the pride and joy I will experience when I finally get to be champion in the "Pretty shit" skill level running competition! Especially if I manage to defeat my handicapped neighbor, that prick keeps boasting about how he's been training hard every day for the past 10 years! I'm not sure you understand what competitive sports are about ...

If I take the example of T-Mobile their fine (80 M$) is 8 days of net income based on their average net income of the past 4 years.

What? Why would you choose to use a combination of 2 formulas when there's one designed to combine them?

I seriously wish all of you slow shitters not to ever find out that you have a hemorrhoid problem.

I don't suppose it can block ads embedded in my mobile apps, which is where I encounter all of these?

He obviously meant to say how do you measure that it’s exactly 1m, even when still in a straight line. Exactly being the key word here.

Or when they’re foreign companies.

That is a valid question, but in that case you just make it a single league, men and women together.

Yes I remember it also had some surprising findings about electrolytes

Aggregations of objective teachings which contradict each other (within the same book).

So basically it says the homeowners will be affected because if they have children they will need to help them ... And for those who have already purchased a home at an expensive price, their mortgage is impacted. Top Notch journalism.

26

I think they were talking about American football.

We could be recycling everything but we’re not, and we’re not going to anytime soon, this would be far more complex than feeding everyone. I’m not advocating for anything, please don’t try to put words in my mouth. We’d have less trouble if there happened to be less of us, that’s it. I never said we should forcibly reduce our population, that’s ridiculous. I’m just tired of seeing this same senseless argument that everything is fine with the population because we could potentially feed everyone.

Just because it’s going to plateau and decrease, doesn’t necessarily mean that we aren’t already above where we should ideally be. Being potentially able to feed everyone is not the only criteria. We are overconsuming and this is in proportion to the world population. Even though it’s not evenly spread and everyone doesn't consume the same, at the end of the day the least people there are the least we consume.