Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KE
Posts
0
Comments
93
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Where do many of these students come from, who are they, how do they get into Harvard, or even our country - and why is there so much HATE?

    The Harvard Corporation is run by strongly left-leaning Obama political appointee Penny Pritzker, a Democrat Operative, who is catastrophic

    What a completely normal and professional letter

  • 1968? There were literally riots

    The loss was perceived to be the result of Johnson and Daley influencing behind the scenes. Humphrey, who had not entered any of the thirteen state primary elections, won the Democratic nomination shortly after midnight, and many delegates shouted, "No! No!" when his victory was announced

  • But the downside is that technically, regardless of what mechanism would trigger the dissolution of parliament, this has to be requested to and accepted by the King, who then sends out Writs of Electors

    Of course in practice this is a rubber stamp tradition with no chance of not happening - if Charles went mad and tried to prevent this we would likely still have an election just with a side order of constitutional crisis and a wave of republicanism

    But it's still dumb

  • I think that's a very narrow view of religion though, albeit one that is true of a lot and I agree is toxic. Ironically since you're a UK person, it's a type of religion I associate with the US and the American right (though I also know through friends growing up that it can be fairly common in some Muslim and Hindi groups)

    I think a lot of times religion is used as a kind of cultural link: 'this is why we have these traditions, this is a moral we have that we can explain with this story' etc. And with that context I think it can be fine, even helpful to raise someone within a religious tradition

    I guess I broadly agree with you mostly, but I would say that religion can be coherent with critical thinking and open-mindedness: it's cultural as much as its about fundamental belief

    (and when it is about fundamental belief then yeah it's often awful)

  • That is a very specific usage: 'The Government' as a proposer of law, Parliament as approvers. Outside of a PPE course it isn't how the term is used and I think you know this.

    In day to day use the government (small g) can be talked about as comprising anyone involved in governance, from the PM down to local councillors, depending on context

    Calling people out on this based on a technicality is like correcting people when they say 'speed' instead of 'velocity', and it's super irrelevant in a thread about MPs acting in a political capacity

  • You seem to be confused. The phrase 'government official' refers to anyone acting on behalf of the government, including backbenchers. This could even include unelected aides, spokespeople or some civil servants.

    You're thinking of the cabinet. You do not have to be in the cabinet to be a 'government official'.

    As a fellow brit, these Americans correcting you are right.

  • Often in lower league football (soccer?), if there's huge game (cup match against bigger opponent, playoff etc), tickets are prioritised for those who have been to more regular games. Makes sense, the more committed fans get priority and avoids scalping.

    This just seems like the same thing to me

  • I agree with your broader point about linguistics, but Chesterton's fence has never sat right with me. Consider the inverse:

    This annoying and unnecessary fence is an inconvenience, but since nobody can remember what it's for, we dare not remove it