KairuByte @ KairuByte @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

154

Joined

2 yr. ago

It’s unprofitable to pay for workers visits to the hospital. Even if you have insurance, which goes up with repeated “accidents”, you’re paying in lost productivity.

These “ai says” articles are all fluff. You can get an LLM to say just about anything you want. This is akin to “my child says we should eat the neighbor.”

Seed boxes are inherently handling replaceable data, bar unpopular torrents. This is such a silly comparison.

You almost got it, gotta remove the space between that last period and the following tilde. Whitespace kills markdown in most cases.

Strikethrough is just surrounding your text with ~~ on either side, touching non-whitespace characters.

~~Like this.~~ looks Like this.

In a perfect world, sure. But in reality, the majority of devices do not have optical zoom. Most recordings of police are done on cellphones, and usually older And/or lower end models that aren’t using optical zoom.

“This recording is inadmissible, it was zoomed in so much it’s impossible to tell with any certainty what is going on.”

Digital zoom is literally just cropping out the rest of the video. You’re not actually zooming in, you’re just losing context.

We’ll still be hulks, it just won’t be that incredible.

Oddly I can see neither this reply, nor my original comment, but can reply from my inbox within Voyager.

Relevant: https://youtu.be/ozezG1zpxXQ

You can have the most secure and secret OS in existence, and you’re failing miserably the moment it has unfettered access to the internet.

On the flip side, literally any OS can be secure if it’s airgapped in a sealed room.

There’s a happy medium in there, and that’s where most governments want to be.

“It’s okay sweetie, the world is literally burning, drowning, and sometimes both at the same time! But in order to protect you, I’ll just say we have no idea why or how to prevent it! Wouldn’t want to hurt your fefe’s by telling you that humans are the problem!” 🤦🏻‍♂️

I’m sorry to interject, but is it a normal response to blurt out a list of people and groups when you don’t understand what is being said?

When you’re at a party, and someone says something you can’t hear, have you ever just blurted out the names of people at the party?

I don’t understand your thinking here. He either heard him and agreed, or didn’t understand him and decided the best course of action was to just list out names of the opposition. Only one of those makes any sense.

And I have to say, when I heard this without a primer, I fully understood what was being said. As did my wife.

Ah okay, just found it curious. Thanks for lettin me know!

Somewhat niche a use case, but *extremely interesting. Hopefully it can be adapted for other conditions!

I feel like the pieces should be 3d as well.

A bot edited its comment? O.o

Then the social left started pushing things that it wanted purely because of morals

Example?

Do you mean Calibre?

Bots are indeed a problem, but at the same time so are the huge swaths of users dedicated to a single users whim. When one person with enough pulls says “I want to take over this entire area of the canvas” and it happens in minutes?… it ruins the experience. Bots are just a way for this to happen without the following.