KairuByte @ KairuByte @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

1

Comments

2,152

Joined

2 yr. ago

Find a new scapegoat.

That’s pretty much how it always goes. This is essentially an expo of “what we can do with a crazy high budget” not “this is what we are releasing next year.”

Wait, you think using Firefox somehow results in them getting money?…

“I don’t understand what’s going on, therefore you are the problem!”

For now*

We are in the middle of tax season. Cutting it now would be worse optics than waiting a couple months and gutting it because “no one used it so it was wasteful.”

Oh honey, find a new song.

Hey, so, can you highlight the part where he Denys that it was a Nazi salute? I must be blind because none of those words mean “that wasn’t a Nazi salute” or anything even close.

This is like when my kid would get in trouble, and instead of owning up to it he would get mad at anyone saying he did the thing he did.

New to the internet?

Totps only works when both source and recipient are synced pretty much identically in time. Meaning the car and fob would need to receive their time from an external source.

Not that hard in many places, just grab the time from a radio broadcast. But what happens when that broadcast isn’t available? You fall back on a known inaccurate time. I’ve seen cars with a bum RTC chip, which lost about a minute a day. That would be enough to kill off this kind of system.

Not to mention that an external time source would be larger, cost more, require more power, and would be vulnerable to brand new attacks.

There is no perfect system. Take your physical lock for instance, there is no unpickable lock. They just plum don’t exist.

Car manufacturers should also be held liable for losses due to lack of protection against jamming.

Did you mean something else here? You can’t “protect” against jamming. That’s like protecting from too much noise in a conversation.

I mean, there’s another side to this.

Assume you have exacting control of training data. You give it consensual sexual play, including rough play, bdsm play, and cnc play. We are 100% certain the content is consensual in this hypothetical.

Is the output a grey area, even if it seems like real rape?

Now another hypothetical. A person closes their eyes and imagines raping someone. “Real” rape. Is that a grey area?

Let’s build on that. Let’s say this person is a talented artist, and they draw out their imagined rape scene, which we are 100% certain is a non-consensual scene imagined by the artist. Is this a grey area?

We can build on that further. What if they take the time to animate this scene? Is that a grey area?

When does the above cross into a problem? Is it the AI making something that seems like rape but is built on consensual content? The thought of a person imagining a real rape? The putting of that thought onto a still image? The animating?

Or is it none of them?

This isn’t really even bad communication. This is idiots with a platform screaming FUD for attention.

Yup. But FUD must be pumped out.

This seems overly optimistic. One thing current algorithms can’t do is adapt to previously unknown situations. Yeah, they can potentially model out a solution if they have enough known factors, but they don’t currently have true problem solving capabilities.

Can that change? Absolutely. But the closest we’ve come to is LLMs which essentially download the entirety of the internet to see what the “most average response” would be to any given situation. But give it something it’s truly never seen before and you get pure gibberish that sounds convincing. And even then it’s just bad.

Did you even read the entry you linked?

Cars crash into buildings all the time. Even if you took the largest consumer car and “drove” it as fast as possible into the side of a skyscraper, you wouldn’t be able to cause anything close to another 9/11.

That said, these are terrible for other reasons.

Wait, you think letting houses burn down is “championing”?

Where the fuck do you live? I want nothing to do with it.

In fairness, they did get at least a little flooding when that one dam was ordered to purge a not insignificant amount of water.

As a country we were given the choice between letting one house burn vs letting the entire city burn, and instead of making a helpful choice a group of people decided to protest fire, and yet more decided to just sit at home while the world burned around them.

They knew what the choices were. Trump flat out said he didn’t care about the constitution, didn’t care about human life, and didn’t care about democracy.

Don’t use chromium?