JesusTheCarpenter @ JesusTheCarpenter @feddit.uk

Posts

0

Comments

65

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't get that, what client are you using?

I wouldn't be surprised if that is not the point.

People.

Everyone is doing this. To be fair I don't blame them. I ignore the titles and watch for the content.

Also, if only there could be more than one country stabbing the other in the back.

Yes. Policy is something to criticize politicians for. But he at least comes across as someone that draws the line at the destruction of the rule of law in USA and I guess that's count for something.

New USA colonialism:

"Let us help you fight for your freedom!"

3 years later...

"Ekhmm.... remember the aid we sent? It wasn't to help you fight freedom after all. It was so now we can feel entitled to your resources."

Check mate.

I DoNt geT tiReD oF wINing!

100% agreed. That is what I see, you can clearly see the line of the reflection of the rock. It is slightly darker due to Fresnel effect. The imperfection is most likely due to ripples of the water surface. The rest of the image also totally consistent with a picture of a lake or a pond beyond a fence.

This is just silly.

This would be a great fit for a r/NotTheOnion type of sub.

I don't need to read an article to know that "no" is the correct answer the question in the title.

🤡

I totally get all the concerns related to AI. However, the bandwagon of: "look it made a mistake, it's useless!" is a bit silly.

First of all, AI is constantly improving. Remember everyone laughing at AI's mangled fingers? Well, that has been fixed some time ago. Now pictures of people are pretty much indistinguishable from real ones.

Second, people also make critical mistakes, plenty at that. The question is not whether AI can be absolutely accurate. The question is whether AI can make on average fewer mistakes than human.

I hate the idea of AI replacing everything and everyone. However, pretending that AI will not be eventually faster, better, cheeper and more accurate that most humans is wishful thinking. I honestly think that our only hope is legislation, not the desperate wish that AI will always need human supervision and input to be correct.

Is it me or are there guts in this picture?

Also, as if many CEO's and upper managements humanize their customers and not see them as numbers in a spreadsheet.

You didn't answer the question brah.

/s

EDIT: Honestly, sometimes people don't pick up sarcasm.

As if this makes any difference to an average Republican and some Democrats. US people panic when they hear socialism even if it's refered to social democratic state which essentially is a hybrid between liberal economy with socialism so that the worst part of the two systems are removed or diminished.

That is to say that USA wouldn't need to turn into Soviet Union to become a social democracy and could have benefits of both systems. Unfortunately the brains have been in the washing for way to long by the wealthy elites as they are the only ones that would lose in such system.

Elephants are also tired of those pesky tourists.

Laughs in Nestle.

Sometimes they do, sometimes (most times probably) they don't. However they don't work 100% of the time if attempts are never made.