Jax @ Jax @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

1,476

Joined

2 yr. ago

Oh, I didn't realize there was a license you could apply for that would give you the right to use assault weapons!

Please, produce it for me so I can get started. I will wait.

Edit: 😂😂 I don't understand how bans work when you've conjured up a nonexistent license. Incredible. Wait wait wait, don't tell me - it's up to the govt you've deemed too inept to handle the licensing?

Do his ribs encase his arms?????

OP was right, this was knowledge no human was meant to have.

Dude, read the article - this isn't regulation, it's a ban.

Holy shit I've been arguing with someone that claims to be able to build bombs but can't manage to determine the content of an article that's been paraphrased for them. If you're basing whether or not guns should be regulated using yourself as a baseline, then god damnit – you got me, I have to agree with you.

Moving the goalposts?

You're on a post about an AR-15 ban but I've somehow moved the goalposts? I'm not wasting my time on this anymore.

I haven't actually been threatening anyone. I'm explaining how very easy it is to kill people and the various things that are unregulated that can be used to do so. Why do you feel threatened?

Almost like you're a fascist that's afraid to get shot.

What makes you think I'd be using thermite as a bomb?

Ok, Mr. "I know what I'm doing and you don't" - I'm not going to continue elaborating on how unregulated materials can easily be used in destructive ways. Apparently someone remotely causing a wildfire in a neighborhood just can't compare to a crowd getting shot.

Beyond anything I've said, one thing is clear - you're advocating for a fascist government continuing to seize individual firearms.

And you're advocating for a fascist government seizing individual firearms. Let me think, for a second, how much I give a shit about your opinions... nope, I don't.

Edit: ad hominem after ad hominem, looks like someone's a fascist afraid to get shot

Red iron oxide and aluminum flakes. Fiber optic drone for around 1-1.5k.

None of that is regulated and I can do far more damage with that than a gun. Give me enough time and I can do better because it's already being done in other countries like Ukraine.

You wanna regulate red iron oxide and drones now that I've put the spectre of thermite drones into your mind? Oh, sorry — you're too fixated on the not napalm to realize the point. My mistake.

Regulation? Seriously?

I can have a drone equipped with a fiber optic cable and a jar of not napalm ready to use on some random nobody for about a thousand bucks. Up that price a little bit and I can not only increase the range — I can just fucking make thermite, use the drone to set a whole neighborhood on fire.

Should we regulate red iron oxide because I've put the spectre of drone warfare into your mind? Do you have any idea how dumb it is to be fixated on guns?

They might be covered by the ear? I'm not sure, they definitely have eyes — but they are very small.

"I'm rubber, you're glue! Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!"

Why am I suddenly reminded of Reddit (and some people here)?

From the article, it seems like they spray spores onto the male mosquitoes and then they go and spread it to the females they mate with. Furthermore, they suggest that it's within a 24 hour timeframe.

These things, to me, point to this being less an STD and more a fungal infection that's spread through close proximity to spores (the kind of proximity you'd get through mating).

It could very well be that by the time the mosquito has mated several times there simply aren't enough spores to infect the females they mate with, as whatever spores are on the surface have either been sloughed off or have started to work their way inwards.

Ultimately I don't know if there's enough information to give you an assertive answer either way, but this combined with the other techniques for mosquito eradication (like sterile males) could be used as a wombo combo to fully eradicate mosquito populations.

Are you sincerely asking?

Well, it's strictly illegal to operate a gun in public — and if we're talking about places that don't have open carry, it takes considerably longer to get your concealed carry and a lot more training.

Not to mention, you can pretty much bet that everyone around you has access to a car in the U.S. . The memes might make you think that every single American has firearms but the reality is that they don't.

Dude it's stuff that I can set on fire that will stick to you, and that's not including all of the other things that can hurt you like cars that are infinitely easier to access and operate. People like you would have us ban everything for no other reason than you're afraid.

Everyone acknowledges that the problem is mental health, everyone is convinced that solving guns is the answer.

You wanna know what I can make using styrofoam (or soap) and gasoline? Fucking napalm. You wanna know what will cause a lot more harm than a gunshot? Fucking napalm.

Is this not just slavery of your progeny?

Don't worry, you're not wrong about China — what's going on in the U.S. is just more televised.

You know, because of the 'freedoms' and whatnot.

'Man up' ahh answer

Jax you rebel, you should show them what you think of censorship by yelling ten times bad word in public. You have my full support, hero.

You are fucking stupid

Technically speaking, speed limits are set for worst conditions.

As in very rainy, very windy, poor visibility, etc.

So no, in your day to day life in ideal conditions — you do not need to follow the speed limit. Am I saying go double the speed limit? No. 10 miles above the speed limit is fine, though.

That being said, people who tailgate others can go fuck themselves. There's never a good reason to be so close behind another car.