Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
156
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • Privacy is not necessarily anonymity. Signal uses a phone number to prevent spam and DDOS attacks on their network. Session doesn't do this and got wrecked by DDOS attacks to the point where most of the major groups are pretty much dead.

    Use Signal to talk to people you know. That's what it's for. You don't use it for anonymous chats.

  • That could be what they're waiting for.

    However, I do not believe SteamOS is going to be the silver bullet people think it is. I'm somewhat of a fanboy of Valve but SteamOS is really only good for a console-like PC experience.

    People who want to ditch Windows need to look at Linux as a whole, not just SteamOS.

    Michael Horn talks about this in greater detail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4g1dZfF5KA

  • No. It's an advertisement of political beliefs veiled as a retro games post.

    "Look at me, I'm a leftist! Oh, and it's relevant because a retro game made me one, see???"

    Give me a break. It's nothing more than an advertisement.

  • Yet again, the analogy fails. This is a community themed after retro games. As is on point for the Fediverse, folks can't resist shoving their political views into everything, then they act as if it's unreasonable for people to say they don't appreciate the attention-seeking, echo chamber nonsense in a totally irrelevant community.

  • You don't get to force politics in a non-political community, then tell people who disagree that they need to go somewhere else. Nope, that's not how it works.

  • That analogy might work if not for the fact that I've attempted to block political discussions from my Lemmy feed through instance blocks, community blocks and word blocks, yet I still see people obnoxiously shoving their political views into everything.

  • Yes, because there's literally no reason to make it about political views. And yes, those titles would be just as ridiculous in my book.

    Again, discussing themes in a game isn't the issue. The issue is that the title was very specifically written that way to catch clicks. Clicks from similar culture warriors and from those who disagree. It's disingenuous and completely unnecessary.

  • That's laughable. It was nothing BUT a cult back then.

  • You can bet your life that they would, had they won in November.

  • Discussing a game's themes isn't the problem. The problem is the context. "How this game made me a leftist". Instead of "let's discuss the themes of this game", it's pushing identity politics. That's the part I take issue with.

  • This is why you should only ever buy physical or DRM-free, rather than streaming. If an artist goes in a direction you don't like, you can still enjoy their older work without giving them active income via streaming.

  • Above all things, the way leftists feel the need to inject and advertise their political views into everything angers me the most. "EvErYtHiNg iS PoLitiCaL" > no, it isn't. Why can't we just play video games to get away from real world stupidity? I just don't get it. I don't need to know your political views. Let's just chat about video games and escapism.

  • I love them if they're done right. Bethesda and CDPR do it right every time. I do really enjoy Ubisoft's open worlds back in the day, such as the old AC games (Rogue and before), Watch Dogs games, etc. Of course, RDR2 is also a masterpiece in this design. You mentioned Days Gone and I enjoy that one too, it's designed in a way that doesn't feel exhaustive.

    Problem is, because of the scope of the games, it tends to take too much time. If the devs don't make the exploration and side activities fun and worthwhile, it's easy to lose steam and get burned out.

    I do find some of them great for killing time, though. I'll sometimes load up Watch Dogs 2 and free roam, do multiplayer activities, hunt down collectibles as I listen to cybersecurity podcasts. Same with RDR2 if I'm listening to podcasts about America or traditionalism.

  • I personally see Peertube as something that'd be better as a small-scale, reasonably low-key way of storing and sharing videos if you're not interested in monetization or views. For example, documentation for a passion project.

    For everything else, a different form of decentralization makes more sense, such as Odysee (though we'll see how the Arweave migration goes).

  • It's pretty pathetic that all someone has to do is just mention Brave on Lemmy and he gets downvoted to oblivion.

  • Not bad but I'll stick with Brave and Brave Search.

  • I respect your choice to do that (kinda sick of arguments in general) but honestly, that's part of the problem. Seems not too many people are willing to have civil discussions these days, it's all so polarized. Have a good one.

  • Sure, but Odysee is an American platform. And ultimately, the only reason your viewers would blame you for others on a platform is because we've infantalized the internet over the past decade or so. Used to be that netizens knew that trolls and bullies exist online and wouldn't blame individual platforms for it.

  • Yep, this is pretty much what I was expecting to hear. You know you can block channels/accounts you don't like, no? I don't believe in censorship of legal speech. As long as no violence is being threatened, as long as drugs aren't being sold and as long as children are not being harmed, it falls under the first amendment. If I don't like what someone says, I just block them because that's what the internet was always about: free expression, even of ideals we don't like or agree with.