They aren't the same thing. With ads the monetization strategy is to implement ads to annoy the user into paying. Then finally paying for it is letting them know that they succeeded in implementing ads in a way that got you to give them money. You are thus incentivizing an ad driven internet.
Paying for access is paying for the service because you think it is good enough to spend money on. This is incentivizing the development of a good service.
Data harvesting another matter entirely. TikTok is going to harvest the data of paying customers and free customers regardless.
The Lemmy instance server hosts it. When you are creating a post and click browse next to the image field it will upload the image to that instance. You can also host it somewhere externally as long as you can get a direct link to the image file. Then you copy paste it into the url field when creating a post.
If you want an image in the middle of your post you click the little image icon above the textbox where you type. Hover over it and it should say "upload image". If you want to do this with an external image the format is like the following
Ads are not the only way to monetize something. There are a few options which I would find agreeable. The first one would be selling it. You pay for access. There is no version in which has ads and the only way to use it is to pay for it. Another method would be to sell more advanced features or some form of usability. Maybe you can only view 1000 videos a month for free, but have to pay for more.
Whatever the method may be, ads are not the only way and unfortunately paying to remove ads just causes more ads to be implemented in things because you are rewarding them for doing it.
Any news on older Pixel devices having a price reduction? Has that been the case in the past maybe? I haven't ever payed close attention near a new device launch.
Also they basically never use space suits. They just check to see if it is a class M planet and then are shocked whenever they discover it toxic in some mysterious way.
I think this abides by the idea of this post, but I would standardize language across the world. Whether it is an existing language or a new language doesn't really matter or maybe a mix of the biggest existing languages.
I remember reading a book where in the future everyone spoke a combination of English and Chinese. They seem pretty incompatible though.
I can't say for sure they were proper research skills but they were some kind of research skills. I'm also not entirely sure what media literacy entails so I'm going to guess that no that was never part of the curriculum at my university.
Depends for how long. Buying a used NAS with a single 1TB drive is probably cheaper over a 10 year period than subscribing to some cloud service for the same duration.
The only useful reviews are the ones you trust from people who share similar thoughts about what you enjoy. You could aggregate the rating of everyone on the planet and it still won't be a useful metric. Reviews from only people self-selecting that would have watched the show in the first place are also not useful.
Reviews from critics who are bribed to give 100% are less than useful. It is worse than useless. It is actively harmful. "Bribed" in the sense that they are given early access to something and don't want to lose access as their livelihoods might depend on it. Sometimes they might be bribed with actual money, who knows.
They aren't the same thing. With ads the monetization strategy is to implement ads to annoy the user into paying. Then finally paying for it is letting them know that they succeeded in implementing ads in a way that got you to give them money. You are thus incentivizing an ad driven internet.
Paying for access is paying for the service because you think it is good enough to spend money on. This is incentivizing the development of a good service.
Data harvesting another matter entirely. TikTok is going to harvest the data of paying customers and free customers regardless.