IMALlama @ IMALlama @lemmy.world

Posts

25

Comments

897

Joined

2 yr. ago

It looks a lot like a typical robotic arm used in manufacturing. A quick Google shows that there are a number of desk mounted versions available, but I have no idea what kind of accuracy they offer. It shouldn't be that complicated of a design and since most approaches use encoders things like missteps should be a thing of the past.

I can't see pulling this off at a home user price point without pretty big compromises on positioning accuracy and/or giving up on feedback.

Discovery will be interesting. I hope that the pilot was on the radio with someone asking for advice/providing updates and doing general CYA things before they physically confronted the passenger. I could easily see the pilot being agitated because they were put in that situation, but I also hope there were other interactions leading up to a rapid escalation.

I wonder if they were in the air or on the ground. Based on the fact that they were detained after they landed I'm guessing they were in the air. The whole thing sounds very non-ideal. Reading through the discovery material, if the case makes it that far, will be interesting.

I grew up with the OG winamp and was trying to dissociate with the handle that I've been using across the web for 25 years, so...

I suggest something where you get to work with a wide range of the populus. Opportunities are basically all service industry jobs: waiting tables in a restaurant, working retail, working in a hotel, etc. Learning how to interact with wide swaths of humans is an invaluable skill that will serve you well in your future professional career. I would focus on building social and emotional intelligence.

I would strongly suspect a retraction/priming or mechanical related issue give byhe fact that it's repeatable in the same area of the print.

Has the printer been used recently and put out good prints? Has anything about the setup changed including a slicer update or different slicer?

I have two knee jerk reactions

Is there an under-extruded section of the print, similar to the corner closest to the camera on the lower section of the print, on the top section of the print? You might have a retraction/priming problem. A quick retraction test print would make this pretty obvious.

You might have had a partial clog that resolved itself, but the fact that the extrusion issues change with the topology of the design makes me want to suggest something else. Try the print again. If you get the same outcome filament isn't the primary cause.

Steve Oedekerk, the writer/star of King pow: enter the fist, is amazing in every way - especially if you were consuming media in the 90s. He

• wrote and directed when nature calls
• cowrote the nutty professor
• wrote including Patch Adams
• wrote Nutty Professor II: The Klumps - wrote and directed Bruce Almighty
• created thumbnation
• executive produced Jimmy Neutron and his studio gave us two Jimmy Neutron movies

What's the error? I had issues trying to upload photos taken on my pixel 3a. They were getting blocked by cloudflare. I traded some messages with an admin and even provided a raw photo. They looked into it, found something, adjusted it, and... still no dice.

I have no issues with my new OnePlus 12. For my 3a, editing the photos in any app, even just to very slightly crop them, would remove whatever was going on.

Ha, I mentally skipped the second yes. Agree, add that to the list.

It depends what you're comparing against. Down relative to the very recent surge? Sure. If you zoom out on that chart you'll see they're still 2-4x more expensive than they were in the early 2020s.

I've only interacted with woodworkers online where people are generally helpful and supportive. Are they really nutjobs in real life?

The old "privacy focused" setting made speech processing local. The new "privacy focused setting" means that processing will happen on a remote server, but Amazon won't store the audio after it's been processed. Amazon could still fingerprint voices with the new setting, to know if it was you or your parents/parter/kid/roommate/whomever and give a person specific response, but for now at least they appear to not be doing so.

This all seems like it's missing the point to me. If you own one of these devices you're giving up privacy for convenience. With the old privacy setting you were still sending your processed speech to a server nearly every time you interacted with one of those devices because they can't always react/provide a response on their own. Other than trying to avoid voice fingerprinting, it doesn't seem like the old setting would gain you much privacy. They still know the device associated to the interaction, know where the device is located, which accounts it's associated with, what the interaction was, etc. They can then fuse this information with tons of other data collected from different devices, like a phone or computer. They don't need your unprocessed speech to know way too much about you.

It's all in the wording, but I think it's also the contradiction between the first and second/third sentences.

Yes yes, intelligent woman be intimidating to some people.

Acknowledges that intelligent women are intimidating to some. It also uses present tense, which implies the author knows this is still the case.

But how old is this, is it still that bad? The "computer girl" could be around 2000.

Ah "it". Which it? That some people are intimidated by intelligent women or that the author encountered a ton of sexism?

I think it's ok to ask how prevalent sexism still is these days, especially if you personally experience it / don't participate in a field dominated by the opposite gender.

Something like "I thought society would have finally realized this behavior wasn't appropriate after me too, is that not the case?" sounds less tone deaf.

So many things these days scream, "I want action, screw results!" It's almost like as society we don't understand mid/long term thinking anymore and are just constantly chasing instant gratification while digging deeper and deeper into the hole we're trying to get out of.

Most of the kits on both sites are going to be pretty solid. You'll be able to find reviews for most of them, as well as a bunch of forums like audio karma and what not.

As for cost/benefit of DIY speakers, DIY speakers that are well designed will punch well above their BOM cost (eg a $300 to build diy speaker will generally outperform a $300 retail speaker). But if you have a pair of decent hifi speakers already it might not be worth the dive. Most commercial speakers tune for a "house sound" so switching brands can be a bit off-putting at first. Let's just say that burn in is a two way road and part of that road is your ear acclimating to the sound profit of the speaker.

Thanks for taking the time to type out that reply, it packed a ton of information. I think you're under selling the eye and the technique necessary to sand well. I've done some DIY auto-body and paint work and I really struggled to know when I had sanded well enough. Yeah, I knew I needed to sand more, but I had no idea where to focus my efforts and couldn't easily distinguish a high spot that needed to get knocked down vs low spot that needed to get filled. Building that skill to the point of it being intuitive seems like something that would take a decent amount of practice or a great coach.

I hadn't considered polishing ASA. I'm somewhat tempted to give it a go. The hardest thing for me would be figuring out how to sand large curved surface in such a way that doesn't result in lots of obvious flat spots. I can absolutely see sanding/polishing making prints a bit stronger.

I'm sorry to hear about your physical condition and wish you as much additional recovery as possible. I totally get having very limited time with two younger kids in my house. I think all in the build took 4-5 months starting from printing parts, ordering a kit, and finishing assembly. Even though my kids are not new to me anymore, I don't know that I've fully come to grips with the fact that I can't complete projects as quickly as I once could and I should probably slow down my rate of project accumulation.

No problem! If you're already designing speakers, printing vs making them out of something else will come down to your CAD skills/speed vs how long it would take you to make a finished enclosure out of a different material like wood.

I wouldn't call anything about the process hard, but it can be a bit time consuming if you're not a CAD ninja already. Either way, doing this will probably improve your CAD skills.

If you've never designed a speaker before, you could purchase a kit for one of the many DIY speakers out there and print the enclosure. My first DIY bluetooth speaker was an Overnight Sensation MTM stuffed in a very undersized, and ported, wood enclosure with a built in bluetooth board, basic BMS, and amplifier. Parts-Express, Madisound, and a number of players make getting a complete DIY kit easy.

I'll take a stab at the colors: slicers are very good at consistent extrusion widths. They do the best they can with varying width, but rarely nail it the first time. The only thing you can really do is fiddle with print settings or change the design to have consistent width extrusions, but that will obviously impact the design. Even with consistent width extrusions you might have to fiddle with extrusion width to nail it.

As for your first layer, are you seeing different squish in different areas of your bed? If yes, are you using a bed mesh?

Grab a few of Ellis's first layer patches, spread them around your bed, and focus on getting them all to look the same.

Edit for link: https://ellis3dp.com/Print-Tuning-Guide/articles/first_layer_squish.html

Sorry for the delay. Yes, I did design it myself. I made a small post about it here that includes some frequency response curves. It sounds much better than the sun of its parts, which weren't that intentionally chosen, but it also makes it obvious how much DSP modern wireless speakers have - especially in the bottom octive. I personally like making things vs buying, so this is right up my alley. I will (eventually) get around to making an updated design with better components, but it's doing just fine so far.

The print itself have proven to be very resilient. It's been knocked off a counter and fallen to the floor more than once. It also frequently serves as a step stool.

Printed enclosures have a bad rap for not being "dead", but the rounded design without large flat surfaces is pretty dead. Yeah, the top and bottom aren't flat but they're not a uniform thickness to give them a bit more strength. The walls are "only" two perimeters, but the extrusion width was something like 0.8mm on a 0.6mm nozzle. I think the print has ~18% infill but it's been a while now.

Let me know if you would like any more information!