Yep you're getting it. That (additional context, or speculation, or opinions) would have to be a separate article, according to the charter. Linking the facts with someone else's opinion isn't allowed, but doing a separate opinion piece (clearly labelled) is ok
This article is reporting facts as they are 100% known, as per the charter. There are no known facts that the pedo was murdered or topped himself, due to obfuscation of the information. It's reported as known, even if that's a bit sparse. AP and Reuters do the same.
You will also be able to find opinion pieces on the BBC on the same subject, you just can't mix the two, as is the case in most journalism nowadays
Dear god no. Wil Wheaton has the most grating, whiny, nasal voice I've ever heard, immediately puts me off any book he narrates. He only has one reading style which doesn't translate at all between different books
First thing, every time you see someone mention Windows, you immediately reply with a smug, self-congratulary and utterly irrelevant comment about Linux
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité