If you willingly typed in the web address to this server, you are part of the "You people".
Lmao how is it misinformation?
It draws a conclusion that is false. The most notable logical fallacy of this is the old campaign during WWII where propaganda posters were put up that said "If you ride alone, you ride with Hitler."
Obviously, no one in WWII was doing that, but America needed gas and oil during war time, it worked to guilt people in drawing a conclusion when the premise was false to begin with.
He didn’t make any claims about risk compared to getting covid.
Then why remove the information? If I was making an argument that was based on a scientific method, I would want more information that disproved my claim, not removing them.
It's more surprising that a rapist, election denier (With no evidence), Money launderer, and past seditionist, is somehow the front runner for the party of law and order.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, the more evidence that comes out, the more republicans want to vote for him.
At least from what I've seen from the Russian navy. They are getting slaughtered by torpedo drones. For a moment, we even had them going into Russia's Dry docks, ruining ships that were being repaired.
While you are partially right, in that you don't need ships on a land battle. I feel this is more of a helicopter analogy. In that Russia does have attack helicopters, but can't use them effectively because they keep getting knocked out by better anti-air weaponry.
If you willingly typed in the web address to this server, you are part of the "You people".
It draws a conclusion that is false. The most notable logical fallacy of this is the old campaign during WWII where propaganda posters were put up that said "If you ride alone, you ride with Hitler."
Obviously, no one in WWII was doing that, but America needed gas and oil during war time, it worked to guilt people in drawing a conclusion when the premise was false to begin with.
Then why remove the information? If I was making an argument that was based on a scientific method, I would want more information that disproved my claim, not removing them.