HikingVet @ HikingVet @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

36

Comments

517

Joined

2 yr. ago

Okay. But how does that point to men wanting women drivers? Which was what I was commenting on.

Really? Seems like a bit of a stretch.

Never heard any of my male friends ever comment on the sex of a driver or even have a preference.

I mean all my evidence on this is anecdotal, and yours seems like it's just conjecture.

Edit: How do men not caring about the gender of their driver reduce the amount of woman drivers for the women who ask for them?

Look who volunteered to die in the first wave.

Well, I can see this leading to harrasment.

And those head worms billed themselves as gods. Like the Asgard got called, in that universe.

What about other strategic resources?

Suffer.

Dude, put the meth down.

Ask yourself that question.

It's main use as a lubricant is a mid level penetrative fluid.

The fucking whoosh on this one.

Or oil cans

As if there aren't other ways to apply lubricants.

Pretty sure that except for the ones that we have to make in a particle accelerator, we could get the full list.

You know there is a thing called division of labour right?

We can have people working on multiple problems at the same time and various efforts might overlap and have a larger effect.

You are now aware of this concept.

Satellite imagery is incredibly useful, especially for those looking to help the planet.

Well, you seem to think the public is a monolith and not a bunch of squabbling tribes.

The people who understand shit want progress and understand the government (when not held back) can make wonderful things happen.

Then you have the people who can't see benefit for anything past the end of their nose arguing to turn the clocks back to 1922 because grandpappy said it was better.

You realise that littering close orbit with more shit is just going to turn it into a whirling extraterrestrial claymore for anything trying to leave the planet.

Everything that goes up there should have a lifespan to come back down.

Aaannnd that doesn't apply here.

Is that the depth of your critique?