HikingVet @ HikingVet @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

36

Comments

517

Joined

2 yr. ago

That not how any of that works.

Or have the first pm who gets assassinated.

Well, she's gonna need to stay hydrated.

This is the second time you have commented on my main while blocked by it.

How are you doing that?

Why don't you DM me here so that maybe we can act like adults?

Ukraine existed before the USSR and Tasrist Russia.

It was an occupied territory.

Not a new account chuckles, check the date. Hole one.

What I was saying and you have been told by others is that Hanks' portrayal is more charitable than they deserve and it makes yhem look like garden variety racists. Hole two.

I feel Hanks went soft on them.

You are worked up about a version of what I said in your fucking mind.

If you were blocked or blocked me why did you go out of your way to be offened?

Saying Tom Hanks portrayal of Maga is charitable of their behaviour is Nazi apologism?

What is your real issue here? You have that account blocked, and blocked so that it doesn't receive notifications. (Edit: I may have blocked you due to this type of behaviour)

Are you afraid that I'll poke holes in your argument?

Were you looking to call me a Nazi or do you just sling mud when someone steps out of your narrow set of authoritarian morals?

Fucking hell, can't the feds just not be shitheels one time?

I wonder how many cis gendered girls are going to get dinged.

Go back to bed.

Sure, because criticizing one government for a specific set of actions and hand waving the same actions by a subsequent government is so rational.

Yeah, because you're such a shining example...

Wow, quite the flip flop.

So the fact that the LGBTQ+ didn't get equal rights there until after Fidel's death isn't an issue for you?

I wonder what thay would smell like.

Claiming you didn't know it could cause harm isn't a defense in court in Canada.

Anymore bullshit?

I don't know about the states, but here in Canada the government takes the position "ignorance of the law is not a defence".

There's the argument that you distrubuted it.

Not if it incites violence, causes harm or any of the other carve outs in the first amendment of the USA.

I am aware that the post is supposed to be funny, and you are most likely making a joke, but this is the internet and these sort of disclaimers tend to be necessary.

Except if they were halfway intelligent they wouldn't have it go automatically to the site.

And when you do this and something goes really wrong criminal charges get laid.