I believe the difference to be that, no matter how much they attempt to copy or derive the art they create a person will always include their own style (for want of a better word). The subtlties from how they learned to draw/paint/whatever, the unconsious biases (good or bad) that lead to their creative decisions. A person imparts themselves, a collection of a lifetime of experiences, unto their art, whether they try to or not. AI does not have these experiences, it can only attempt to recreate from what it has seen. AI cannot add itself to the art it creates, because it doesn't have a self to add. AI art is intrinsically bad because it cannot exist in a vacuum and cannot add anything of artistic value when it exists in a world of artists.
Assuming binary options of cautiousness (either you can be cautious or not) and only one being correct, 'being cautious is correct' is equivalent to NOT 'being cautious is incorrect'. Which is what I said.
They didn't say they would yield, just take slightly more time to make the appropriate checks. And not sure about your car, but most have lights that indicate what they're doing (slowing/stopping and signaling); which a cautious driver would likely use more effectively than I would assume someone who just drives how they think other people are expecting them to would.
HeuristicAlgorithm9 @ HeurtisticAlgorithm9 @feddit.uk Posts 0Comments 38Joined 2 yr. ago
I think 'Dudes' is being used as a gendered term for men in the meme