HellsBelle @ HellsBelle @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1,918

Comments

2,172

Joined

9 mo. ago

Rule 1, the headline must match the original.

Please change it.

Please change the title to match the one in the article.

Rule 1, please change the headline to what is on the article.

Rule 4, title has to match the source.

Please change it.

What If I shoot them 8n the head? Is that enogh confirmation?

I sure fucking hope so 'cause as a Canadian woman I'm gonna kick your ass beyond your wildest nightmares.

Testicles on a necklace around my neck style buddy.

Let's see who wins dumbfuck.

;)

Honest to god I would save until my death to buy a Hugo Boss so I could support this.

Wut?

The terminal is set to be running by the mid 2030s and the expansion would allow the port to handle an additional 2.4 million twenty-foot equivalent units a year. That represents a 70 per cent increase to the port’s 2024 container volume of 3.5 million. Vancouver’s port says it already handles almost as much cargo as the next five largest Canadian ports combined. Article content

Pang said the port hasn’t got a policy to penalize bidders from any particular country, such as China or the U.S., despite a movement in the country to steer government contracts to domestic companies. British Columbia’s ferry company, for example, is embroiled in a political controversy over a major contract that was awarded to China. But suppliers of building materials from Canada would have natural advantages because they’re closer, Pang said.

This is a load of bullshit. Who makes the money here? Who give control over the port to a private enterprise here?

Who? Fucking? Wins? Here???????

I supported Carney from the start. If this is what he's aiming at completing I'm walking away ... with the hopes that he FUCKING STOPS N O W with this shit.

Read it and weep asswipe.

As it stands right now you're not leading, you're following.

S T O P.

I T.

F F S.

I ... umm ... choose to take your comment as a sarcastic hit against thise who believe filth vs truth.

That is my choice and I will stick with it to the end of me ... because the opposite is death.

That's fair and acceptible by the rules the Canadian gov't had in place.

And I get people being unhappy Tesla used the rules to their own benefit ... but the problem isn't with Tesla ... it's with the Trudeau gov't who did sfa to make the rules strong, where 'saving' sales for a future 'windfall' was NOT allowed.

Don't be pissed at the messenger here. Be angry with the leadership that made lax rules that helped the rich cunts more than it did the average human being.

Archive link

Please change the title to the one the article has.

That's rule 1 of this instance.

Archive link

Notes -

Not to be be confused with "Playing Checkers With Pigeons" appearing in a Sesame Street sketch from 1978.[1]

The EUObserver pretty much says the same thing.

https://euobserver.com/eu-and-the-world/ar0ec480cc

But one Toronto MP, who asked not to be identified to speak freely, said the mayor didn’t act because of her electoral considerations.

The next municipal election is scheduled for fall 2026, and a recent poll found that 53 per cent of residents disapproved of Chow’s performance.

Chow was elected mayor in a 2023 byelection, winning just over 37 per cent of the vote. She dominated the central wards and won most of Scarborough, but lost in suburban Etobicoke and North York.

The areas that blocked sixplexes (Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, with the exception of Ward 23) are also the areas most resistant to density, and where council opposition was strongest.

The MP said Chow’s decision on sixplexes is an effort to “hold on to every vote” she won in the suburbs north of Bloor Street while reassuring her downtown base.

I hate that too often politicians base their decisions on what could happen in futire elections.

I mean almost none of them prioritize their civic duty and what's best for their constituents anymore. It's all "But what about my re-election!" bs now.

But again, report to who?

Doctors have a duty to report ...

Ok. Who does he report to in this instance. The House Oversight Committee, or Trump?

If the physician does either of those he's breaking confidentiality and that's a big no-no.

Archive link

Fyi this article is 3 months old.

I'm guessing you drink alcohol?