You're describing a home inspector. I've never had a realtor assess the condition of a house. It's not their job. Plus, even with the best realtor, having an intermediary during negotiations only ever makes the process more complicated. If you have a home inspector and a good lawyer you can easily do rest yourself with no real risks. Both of them charge fixed fees for their services too and I wouldn't buy a house without both anyways. Realtors are 100% superfluous.
It's so funny to me how transparent these capitalists are. "We can't find any employees!" That's strange because all of their competitors who increased wages have employees and there are 1.4 million Canadians looking for work. Damn lazy entitled business owners and the politicians that enable them.
What evidence do you have that she's intersex? No one anywhere has come forward to share test results that show she's intersex or anything but cis female. Sure some Russian guy who got fired for corruption said it to a reporter ONE TIME after Imane beat a Russian boxer, but that's literally all you got.
Based on nothing.... You spent 20 severely downvoted comments to say "I don't have any evidence but in my heart I feel like she's not a real woman and shouldn't be allowed to box at the Olympics"
I'm glad you're not in charge of anything, fuck, this shit's wild!
I get your sentiment, certainly. When regulations work well they protect engineers and technicians from the pressure to cut corners to save money. That's hard work that can only be done by well funded and fully empowered regulatory bodies something that's unfortunately become a political issue and is being actively undermined.
That being said I've been on both sides of the engineer-regulator relationship and I've rarely been in a "trust us bro" situation. Both sides want a safe, high quality product. When regulators work well, they can definitely protect engineers from capitalist pressure. Being able to say "sorry, I know it's expensive, but we have to do it or we won't get certified" is worth its weight in gold when you're trying to design a good, safe product!
Public safety should be managed by public entities, not private. That's a blatant conflict of interest and I'm not a fan whatsoever.
Some things can sometimes work well, like when the regulation is publicly managed but privately tested using straightforward methods. UL does decent work here, but the profit incentive on both sides creates a nasty conflict of interest and puts pressure on engineers and technicians that compromises their work and integrity.
There is nothing fundamentally broken about our regulatory system except politics. If the funding stops getting cut and politicians stop gutting regulatory bodies' ability to interpret and enforce regulations there won't be a problem.
Regulators in general care about their work, care about public safety, and use sound statistical approaches to getting the best bang for the taxpayer and corporate dollar. Keeping private profit out of the equation means costs are low and companies aren't at a competitive disadvantage internationally.
You're getting downvoted but people REALLY don't understand the field of regulation. How many regulators do people think exist? Compare that with the number of engineers and technicians designing building and testing cars at the OEMs? Do you think these people can get 100% validation? Do you think there is budget or appetite to achieve this level of regulation?
It's not even a desirable goal. Do you think every batch of food and agricultural goods that is manufactured or imported is 100% inspected? How feasible do you think that is?
The point is regulators are generally able to use sound statistical methods to obtain excellent levels of public safety with TINY budgets. Sure, more would be better, but it will never be necessary to get close 100% coverage simply because most humans WANT to make a quality product and most manufacturers.......... at least have a brand to protect in terms of not killing anyone.
I'm not really going to argue with that much defeatism, I just want to clarify that being a person that's enjoyable to be with doesn't mean being a Hollywood movie definition of a "fun" person. It doesn't require you to change into someone else. It just means you work to improve yourself, reduce the aspects of yourself you don't like and increase the prevalence of aspects of yourself you do like.
You don't need to become a "fun" person, just a YOU that you would want to spend time with.
Nobody is forcing you to improve yourself, but like I said before, if you wouldn't want to spend time with yourself why would anyone else? Even if you live the rest of your life alone, would you not prefer being able to enjoy your own company?
The first asks are you fun to be around? If you were a fly on the wall in your house would you think "this is a person I want to be with, their activities, demeanor, and level of self-care are something I find attractive". If you don't want to be with yourself why would anyone else? Work to being and staying a person you enjoy being around.
The second is more applicable to people who are alone and introverted. If you lived two streets over from yourself how could you meet yourself. If you're not someone that ever interacts with new people then how can you meet anyone? Find ways to open yourself up to meeting people you want to be with and who want to be with you. This could be through hobby based communities, to socializing with classmates and co-workers, to meeting friends of friends, to joining new groups or classes you're interested in.
No. A mother/parent/or guardian can abandon a newborn at most hospitals, fire stations, or safe haven deep off stations. In most cases the process is anonymous if you want it to be.
It's just how the industry markets chicken nuggets to adults "these aren't children's chicken nuggets, they're BONELESS WINGS for manly men who enjoy suicide hot sauce"
That doesn't sound right. How can you guarantee zero fly/fruit fly eggs in something like orange juice with pulp. Fly eggs are tiny and can be found on fresh fruit skins even on the trees. Certain juices preclude the kind of filtration that could be used to achieve 100% fruit fly egg removal. I don't know anything about European food regulations, but from a practical perspective it seems impossible to guarantee ZERO fruit fly egg contamination. Especially considering Europe tends to be more flexible with insects in food than the US such as Casu martzu.
I suspect if there really is no max insect parts limit, there is a procedural requirement that ensures contamination is kept low.
There's the apples and there is the bunch. IDF is the bunch I was talking about with individual soldiers who are caught committing the crimes being the bad apples. Hamas is all bad apples as far as the bunch goes. But if you're insinuating that Palestine is the bunch then that's just the kind of dehumanizing energy the IDF is looking for. You should join and take pot shots at kids playing in the streets to fill the hospitals before calling in an airstrike.
You could have paid an interior designer a couple hundred dollars for a home visit and better advice. Nothing your realtor did was worth a 5%-6% cut.