Guntrigger @ Guntrigger @feddit.ch

Posts

0

Comments

426

Joined

2 yr. ago

Even if they are, it's an extremely unprofessional move on his part at the very least.

I think that would be at least just as bad.

Wow, they invented sailing!

So generous.

That's good additional info.

I don't understand this logic. IDF literally shooting someone is somehow less of a "use of a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death" than throwing a stone at a car?

I get that they deemed the person dangerous, but shooting someone for throwing a stone is a slippery slope to all sorts of things, eg. Kettled protesters who start throwing stones at riot police. Should the police just mow them all down because rocks can be deadly?

In a modern globalised society, shouldn't we be tolerating when other people find something sacred, rather than burning it because we don't?

I get that he has beef with Islam because we can see his backstory, but I question the motives of anyone who jumps on the book burning bandwagon.

I see you guys posting these ceasefire violation images all the time like it's some smoking gun for Ukraine being the aggressor in their defensive war.

Where does it show which troops the ceasefire violation was committed by? And why would ceasefire violations along an internal border like this warrant a full scale invasion from another country?

It looks good. Reminds me of Halo start screens. I wonder if there's a rousing orchestral accompaniment.

Using "woke" as a negative and using the term "soyboy" at all are both huge red flags.

Gives off "alpha male" incel vibes.

Reminds me of Oblivion

Oh I know rocks CAN be deadly. But so can lots of things. From the info in the article they were throwing rocks at cars, not IDF forces who are undoubtedly armoured to the teeth for greater stopping power than rocks.

Just seems strange to shoot someone for not obeying when they aren't directly threatening you, but the article is a bit light on actual details. Being the source that it is, I don't think they would hesitate to highlight the IDF were defending themselves if they actually were.

I don't think the other party are really trying to convince the quran burner they are wrong though, they just want them to stop defiling their most sacred object.

It's just senseless on both sides to me.

the soldiers began a “suspect arrest procedure,” which included opening fire at one of the suspects

Seems like a slightly harsh procedure to arrest someone with stones as their weapon.

I don't really get the "I'm burning it for your own good" defence.

Burning any book doesn't help anything. Reading the Quran doesn't immediately convert you to Islam and alluding to that makes it seem even more powerful than it is.

All historical "dangerous books" should be read with some context and discussion.

I think it's quite extreme to compare razzing someone with a fire extinguisher to violent crime.

You just reminded me that Gaufres de Liege exist and I'm sad I'm not anywhere near a place that I could get one.

As an Englishman, I can't think of anyone else that does pronounce the G unless they speak like Brian Blessed.

That's a surprising stance coming from SatansMaggotyCumFart

I mean, I imagine they would come home after the final anyway!