Grazed @ Grazed @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

18

Joined

9 mo. ago

Sorry I'm late, but I don't think Matthew 25:41 suggests Jesus believed in eternal punishment. It's a very specific theology that we know very well today, so it's easy to read it into the text. But that verse says that the fire is eternal, not necessarily the suffering.

It's pretty likely that Jesus believed in the idea of the "second death"(not eternal).

“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” (Matt 10:28)

Its more likely that Jesus's understanding of hell is far from the modern Christian theology.

Now about human hierarchy:

Off the top of my head, we have:

• Jesus commanding the rich man to sell everything he has and give the money to the poor
• "the last will be first and the first will be last"
• Luke 6:20-25
• talking with and standing up for sex workers

I'm sure I can find more when I have some time.

That any person who disobeyed the ruler should be tortured.

If this is about hell, I don't think Jesus believed in hell, at least not as we know it. He also did definitely teach about erasing the social hierarchy, at least among humans. So he was a theocrat, sure, but he wasn't only a theocrat.

Canadian here. Choosing between UK English and US English feels like choosing between an abusive father and abusive husband.

God you're stupid if you somehow came to that conclusion after I said I prefer the Democrats twice

You said you voted against fascism, but you voted for lesser fascism. I'd probably do the same but I'm not gonna pretend like Democrats are the good guys.

I take it you voted 3rd party then

The liberals are not a left wing party, but ya people are just scared of trump and our own conservatives, understandably so.

I'm not American but I probably would have voted Democrat if I was.

However, Democrats who are more mad at leftists voting third party than they're mad at republicans or their own fucking party that simply could not be bothered to stop bombing children to gain the left-wing vote: Go fuck yourselves.

Y'all, these comments are not it. How are you more upset about fat people than how the airlines have given all our leg room and storage space to first class/business class?

"Unless you only care about closing tickets, that is."

Perfect. I'll use it for tests at work then.

This is completely tangential but I think juniors will always be capable of things that LLMs aren't. There's a human component to software that I don't think can be replaced without human experience. The entire purpose of software is for humans to use it. So since the LLM has never experienced using software while being a human, there will always be a divide. Therefore, juniors will be capable of things that LLMs aren't.

Idk, I might be missing a counterpoint, but it makes sense to me.

What about word of mouth? If I want to find a good place to eat, I find asking a local "hey what's the best restaurant around here?" to yield way better results than ads.

Yes, but they also enforced a carbon tax on provinces that removed their own program.

There's also Carney scrapping the capital gains tax increase on cap gains over 250k.

I don't deny they've always been a right wing party, but they seem to be moving further right - that's my only point.

Liberals when conservatives do conservative shit: "this is awful"(rightly so)

Liberals when liberals do conservative shit: "this is fine"(it's not)

Everything points to a right-wing pivot for the liberals and the voters seem just fine with that.

For what it's worth, I'm a mid 20s software developer and I store lots of files on my desktop. Ive heard the main argument against it, but imo the convenience is just worth it.

This is native while termux is emulated, I think.

I agree with you, and I use it that same way. But I think it should be something the user explicitly seeks out. The problem is that everyone who uses Google now unintentionally use an LLM in the exact same way they've always found human-written content. It's fundamentally different content, so shoving it into the existing interface is begging for confusion.

The main problem I see is that Google just shouldn't include AI results. And they definitely shouldn't put their unreliable LLM front and center on the results page. When you google something, you want accurate information, which the LLM might have, but only if that data was readily available to begin with. So the stuff it can help with is stuff the search would put first already.

For anything requiring critical thought or research, the LLM will often hallucinate or misrepresent. The danger is that people do not always apply critical thinking. Defaulting to showing an LLM response is extremely dangerous, and it's basically pointless.