GooberEar @ GooberEar @lemmy.wtf

Posts

0

Comments

456

Joined

11 mo. ago

It doesn't matter one way or the other, but there's either some manner of miscommunication / misunderstanding going on here or that's not completely accurate / applicable to the relatives I mentioned.

For instance, I found this:

ten states that use their own eligibility guidelines are even stricter than the SSA. Moving to one of these states could result in a denial of Medicaid coverage

A couple of things to note: I did actually look around a bit and found multiple sources that suggest the same, just that the one I linked to said it most concisely and one of the states my relatives lived in is on that list. Obviously I'm not claiming that those sources are more accurate than your professional expertise, and I'm aware that just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true. Also, wanted to reiterate that this happened decades ago, which makes me wonder if things could have been a little different back then.

I appreciate you for acknowledging it.

For sure! I'd love to switch to solar (or any alternative carbon-friendly / carbon-neutral energy source) entirely and specifically for the perceived environmental benefits. But I'm also not in a financial position where I can do it when it happens to cost so much more than traditional means. If I had been fortunate enough, like my neighbor, to have been in the position to make the plunge 10 - 15 years ago, it would make perfect sense. But with all the government subsidies being cut, the power company drastically reducing what they pay for the excess energy, and the cost of batteries plus associated equipment being so high, it's pushing solar back into the territory of being unaffordable for a lot of people. Really sad in so many ways. And yet, I'm still trying to figure out how I might make it work.

I somewhat agree, but I bet it's a bit more complicated than that. Whether rooted in reality or not, part of me thinks that a lot of those 80 million people (if the numbers I saw are accurate) are comprised of children and some quantity of people who can't or aren't really mentally competent enough to make rational voting decisions. Feels like it's hurting the most vulnerable, rather than the people who are literally asking for it.

Mostly, I'm just a little surprised to hear that the number is so high. If 25% of the population alone is on medicaid, and assuming there's any where near comparable percentage of people on medicare, it's hard to understand the argument against universal and/or single payer healthcare systems.

I noticed that you didn't bother to answer or either acknowledge my question, which makes me think you're just being a troll. I would actually feel bad if you were legitimately upset by anything I said, for the record, but your responses leave me feeling like you're just poking for an emotional response.

I'm not certain, either. I think some people are ignorant enough that they would take my statement as a personal insult, which it is absolutely not, in any way shape or form.

It is not a character flaw for someone to not have enough money to handle unpredictable expenses. But it is naive and/or ignorant to consider yourself in "good financial position" if you're not in good enough shape to afford necessary transportation related expenses like car repairs or acquiring a new vehicle when the old one dies.

While I anticipated snark and/or sarcasm as a response, I feel that it's totally unwarranted. I'm of the opinion that the amount of money I make is irrelevant here, so I would only ask: Why do you feel that's relevant?

My statement is not a value judgement on anybody that can't afford a car repair, so if that's how you are interpreting what I said, that's more of a reflection on yourself than on me.

I don't recall the exact timeline, but about 10 - 15 years ago my neighbor got a bunch of solar panels installed. Between state and federal funding, almost 2/3rds of the cost was subsidized. On top of that, the local power company pays 1-to-1 for the energy she produces during the day because she is grandfathered in. Her power bill maxes out at something like $30.

I was strongly considering getting solar panels for my house in recent history. The power company no longer pays 1-to-1 for new installations, they only pay approximately 30%. So if they charge 18 cents per kilowatt hour, they'd only credit me 6 cents. On top of this, the state I live in no longer offers tax incentives, so the only thing I had going for me was the federal incentives. Even at that, it wasn't worth it from a purely economic standpoint when I did the calculations.

The icing on the cake is that when the power goes out, you still lose power even if you have solar panels. The only way around that in my part of the world is to go completely off grid, buy a bunch of extremely expensive equipment and batteries, or to have someone do an illegal connection.

So, we came to conclusion that solar wasn't really affordable for us. The monthly payments on the loan were going to be about 20% higher than our current electric bill and by our calculations, it was going to take about 17 - 20 years to break even. And that's only if the equipment lasts that long, which is a gamble given our weather that includes hurricanes, tornadoes, and so on.

I forget where I read this recently and I can't confirm the veracity of this claim, but supposedly 80 million Americans are on Medicaid. If that's true, that's close to 1/4 of all Americans that would be affected by this.

I'd offer up myself but I'm already happily taken.

Might as well.

Not trying to be mean or snarky, but if car trouble is enough to put your "good financial position" in jeopardy, then I'm not sure I agree with you that you're in a "good" financial position.

I mean, given all the plane disasters happening as of late in the USA and its soon to be territories, I'd say 2025 is lined up to be the year it actually starts literally raining men.

Write a check, honey. Them slow ass bitches behind you will love it.

Are you single? I've got eligible male and female friends of all sexual persuasions that I'd love to introduce you to.

It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.

I don't think this experience is as universal as some people might think. Maybe it's because I grew up in a poor district, but most of those wall mounted sharpeners at the "bin" were broken or had been removed decades prior. And in the few select cases where they existed and were functional, the teachers would absolutely no put up with kids taking frequent or extended sharpening breaks.

When I was a kid, Joe Rogan was hot and either he wasn't crazy back then or we weren't connected enough for me to know the truth about him.

I'm honestly sad that anyone would feel this way, because of the implications. Having said that, I understand why you'd feel that way, even if the presentation is regrettable.

If my statement could be interpreted in any way congruent to your first paragraph, then there's clearly been a significant degree of miscommunication and/or misunderstanding.

I've reread my statement and there's no mention of shopping around for the best deal, so I'm going to chalk that one up to you misunderstanding what I wrote. As for the use of smorgasbord, I understand that it might suggest abundance in some way, though in my part of the world it generally conveys the concept of variety more so than abundance. Either way I chalk that up to miscommunication on my part.