GlitzyArmrest @ GlitzyArmrest @lemmy.world

Posts

62

Comments

434

Joined

2 yr. ago

Isn't this the same OP that claimed they wouldn't track users and then in the next breath said they'd log IP addresses? And on top of everything the only two login options were Twitter and Facebook?

Awesome! My small business definitely only trusts accountants and bookkeeping services that post spam advertisements to Lemmy. When can we start?

Yes, according to their historical data Seagate drives appear to be on the higher side of failure rates. I've also experienced it myself, my Seagate drives have almost always failed before my WD drives.

This is misinformation, I have always known what drives to expect when shucking. Not only that, but you can tell what drive is inside just by plugging it in before shucking to check. I've shucked over 16 drives so far and all were exactly as expected.

The drives for WD are white label, but they're WD Reds. They're cheaper because they're consumer facing, no more, no less. Have you been bitten by shucking in the past? I'm confused why else you'd be saying it's a risk. The only risk associated is warranty related.

That info can be found in the smart data for the drives, but I didn't mean 10,000 hours, more like > 50,000

The NAS itself will likely outlive the drives inside, just the nature of things. Hard drives follow a sort of curve when it comes to failure, most fail either immediately or in a few 10000 hours of run time. Other factors include the drives being too hot, the amount of hard power events, and vibration.

Lots of info on drive failure can be found on Backblaze's Drive stat page. I know you have shucked drives, these are likely white label WD Red drives which are close to the 14TB WD drive backblaze uses.

The problem is exactly that you can't wash it. Prints have dips, bumps, and gaps, especially at the microscopic level. The perfect place for bacteria to find a home. Resin would be one thing, but filament can't be made safe, not for food, and definitely not for medicine that goes into your lungs.

Spoiler: it won't be $25,000.

Greedy short-sighted execs strike again.

Unemployment isn't enough, I'm not forgetting that at all.

Well, obviously we'd take their money AND eat them. Luckily billionaires are low in carbs.

Yep, that sounds great to me! At least for large corporations. Obviously shouldn't apply to contractors, but that sounds great.

You're right, why throw perfectly good billionaire meat into the sun? We can eat them at home instead.

I mean, I'm not a lawmaker, but ideally if execs do layoffs they should either have to also layoff a certain percentage of upper level execs dependent on the # of people laid off, and/or the company or execs should have to pay fees dependent on the # of people laid off.

And kegs, lots and lots of kegs.

We need laws around layoffs, stat. It shouldn't be legal for execs to layoff a thousand people and still keep their own jobs. It's their failure that caused the issue in the first place - they've been safe for too long.

There should be a law that for each layoff a company does, a certain percentage must be executives. These execs have been safe for far too long.

I highly doubt that poverty will ever be eradicated, unless we do something like shoot billionaires into the sun once they reach a billion.

I prefer uBlock Origin on hard mode instead, personally. Of course it probably isn't as through.