GiveMemes @ GiveMemes @jlai.lu

Posts

1

Comments

787

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why are you referring to yourself in the third person?

Yeah idk why I'd be comparing two American companies outside of the US. Fair enough I guess though...

Maverick.

According to the American consumer, they are affordable, or else they wouldn't be the most popular new car.

Also, you were the one that brought up affordability.

I drive a 90s volvo and you can pry it from my cold dead hands. I have no intention of buying a new vehicle any time soon. It has nothing to do with me being out of touch and everything to do with statistics concerning vehicle sales.

Males are actually born at a higher rate than females, but just tend to die younger, which is why there are more females than males generally.

I'd argue that french might be worse. Not a lot worse, but worse.

It's possible for the stock market only to grow because it externalizes costs (environmental damage, health of workers, etc.), and if that's the case, we need to see if society is actually proceeding in a positive direction as a whole (I generally believe this to be the case), but consider for a moment that the economic windfall experienced by many western nations was (and still is in many ways, think banana plantations) largely made possible by the subjugation of imperialized nations. In this case, was the economic windfall experienced by the imperial powers and their trade partners actually a good for society as a tide that rose all boats, or not?

If we fail to consider the biggest losers of the stock market, those that cannot even necessarily participate, it becomes much closer to gambling at the very least. I'm not here to have an argument about whether or not capitalism and the stock market and such things are actually good or bad for society as a whole, just that it's easy to ignore the biggest losers of the system by virtue of the fact that they don't necessarily even invest in the first place. In this case, the universe is the casino, and humanity are the gamblers, as compared to just the stock market being the casino and the investors the gamblers.

Not that your comment is wrong necessarily just that there's more ways of thinking about it.

People can't afford Ford anymore

Reality, in which the ford f series is the most sold vehicle for the past 42 years

Pick one

Ford is moving its prices upwards because people want and pay for what they're offering, very clearly given the statistics we have. Also to say that tesla is the brand regular people can afford when both brands have ev trucks and one has a starting msrp almost 30k more than the other is kinda hilarious.

Lastly, ford has a vehicle with an msrp of 23,920 while the lowest priced tesla vehicle is 38,890 dollars. Even taking gas savings over 5 years into account, ($4,223 if you happen to live near my area and drive about 10k miles per year) the tesla is significantly more expensive. Clearly, tesla is not the company concerned with the common man. To make that point even more clear though, one needs only to compare tesla to the Korean and Chinese EVs that are being offered at significantly lower prices.

Or as they're known to the rest of the world, subhumans :p

Isn't his name piers? I feel like we should be making fun of him for that alone. Like who tf names their kid piers?

What about the scientific method is 'unviable'? What is the issue with empirically driven analysis? Is your issue not with those things? If it's not, then your issue is not with science, but capitalism. It's pretty simple, really.

No, it isn't.

Are you sure you've put in your actual waist measurement and not your hips? The 'waist' on most pants nowadays sits at or below the hip line and is therefore gonna be fairly wider than your waist. If you look up a graphic it should make sense

Alternatively, UV light and a some heat should do it pretty quick!! Radical reactions are dope like that

I assume this is a reference to Reagan's idea of a "proportional" response? If so, props

Not in the US military, and I'm sure others as well. What civilized nations are you referring to? I can only speak to the US, but enlisted soldiers here take a pledge to follow orders, while the officers are actually the ones to take a pledge to uphold the US constitution.

I literally respond the same way to people that talk that way about isis. Get your finger outta yer ass. Read my comment history if you don't believe me.

Spoken like somebody who has never encountered violence before.

And it totally has nothing to do with the huge # of third party journalists that have been killed by the IDF already despite incredibly clear press markings. It's almost like the IDF wants the ability to control the narrative or something...

Yeah I get that and agree, but I think that language is important in these situations. That's about something that has nothing to do with rights and minimalizes the actual civil rights issues that we DO have by association. I agree that education is important, but that has nothing to do with a legal fight for rights.

Sorry, but they can still vote, right? This isn't anything to do with 'rights'.