Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GI
Posts
6
Comments
1,334
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Recruiters definitely don't pull $100k+ by not hiring people - it's pretty common to get paid on a commission-basis for successful hires.

    This is not to say trying to get a job doesn't suck, it definitely does. Sales is generally pretty shit if you're not used to it, and getting a job is at the end of the day a sales process.

    Hope it gets better for anyone stuck in it

  • but the best is to walk in a park, but that raises your chances of getting murdered by a lot so idk

    Is this a vibes-based take of do you actually have any stats on the matter?

    Fwiw, the best is hands down a walk in a still kind of crowded city center. Few things bring as much security as eyes on the street

  • It's not to say I accept it, but I also know that I don't exactly have a choice in the matter.

    This has been the worst part about working in tech since the big layoff period from about the beginning of 2023 - unthinkable levels of uncertainty in your life.

    Still definitely got a better deal than most in life, but damn if it hasn't been mentally taxing

  • Depends on if the good people have better places to go, I guess. My guess is that you're probably going to lose people who have some amount of tenure, especially if you're the kind of company that gives equity that vests on a 4-year schedule. Even if you're not, people with some amount of tenure will be the ones trending towards being checked out already.

    Losing people with tenure means you lose organisational memory, which can definitely be negative.

    This is all to say that as an organisation, you should think twice about doing any kind of layoff. They are all bad in their own way. This just happens to be the format that is least bad for most workers, which is why I prefer it.

  • To preface, I don't think it was right that Salwan was killed. May his murderers be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

    That being said, make sure that you actually understand the background of the matter before you start spewing off bigotry against Muslims in this thread. The Wikipedia-article is a good start - I recommend using translation software to read the Swedish one as well as it has more detail on the subject.

  • This is the best way to do headcount reductions imo. In large organisations there's always someone who's been there for a long time and gotten tired of the work, and that would gladly take this type of offer if it's lucrative enough.

    To demonstrate - imagine that you've been considering quitting your job for a while. Then someone comes along and says that if you do that, you also get some additional cash for free. You'd probably take it, right?

    And if you necessarily need to reduce headcount, then there's also the argument that if someone leaves voluntarily, then someone who wants to stay doesn't have to get pushed out.

    So yeah, I'm not against this

  • I thought it sounded strange when he spoke as well. Turns out he has some condition which makes it sound like that, so maybe we shouldn't point it out.

    Or maybe we should - the right has nothing against playing dirty, maybe it's time to take the gloves off. Who knows.

  • Sweden did something similar for a long time, making every owner of a TV pay a license fee. Then the enforcing body tried to reclassify all computers as TVs, including smartphones, since these could technically access the online streaming version of the state-owned media. A ridiculous interpretation that was ultimately struck down in court.

    All this did was cause unnecessary friction, and kept a bunch of really useless people on payroll to collect this fee.

    We resolved it in the end by just making it a tax instead, and it's never been better. Rest in piss, Radiotjänst, nobody ever liked you