GenderNeutralBro @ GenderNeutralBro @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

1

Comments

1,001

Joined

2 yr. ago

LOL, figures.

I assume GrapheneOS will nip that right in the bud, but I'm not totally sure what Google's recent change to the AOSP reference device means for GrapheneOS. If they can't make GrapheneOS for Pixel 10, I will most definitely not buy one. Without GrapheneOS, I don't think a Pixel would even be in my top 3 phone choices.

Wasn't 14 still in beta? Do they ever release final versions?

I don't want to play a numbers game with factors I have no control over, nor visibility into.

I mean that an individual folder will always look the same (consistent), and also look distinctly different from any other folder (unique) if that's how you arranged it. So you could identify a folder instantly.

Everything in list view looks the same at a glance, and most file managers don't retain a folder window's size and placement. Modern macOS kiiiind of does but you have to fight it if you don't want a single-window browsing UI.

It's been a while since I tried Samsung Browser, but I recall that it was very fast and also supported ad blocking.

I use Firefox on Android because I like syncing tabs to my desktop.

The last time I found icon view useful was in Mac OS 9. There were three main characteristics that made it useful that no current systems have AFAIK:

1. The icon grid was tight (32 pixels) and you could either snap items to that grid or place them freely.
2. Window sizes and places were directly associated with folders. (There was no "browser-style" single-window mode.)
3. File names used dynamic spacing. Longer names would occupy multiple grid spaces as needed.

These factors meant that every folder had a consistent and potentially unique size, placment, and layout.

OS X took the Finder and either ruined or neglected everything good about it. Windows explorer has always been garbage. Never found a Linux file manager with a compelling icon view either (though to be fair, I've never looked all that hard). The lack of system-level metadata for layout kind of mandates an abstraction between a directory and its display.

Saaaaame.

I'm hoping to upgrade to the 10 this year. Memory and storage are the biggest thorns in my side now. A bump to 12GB of RAM should bring me back into "good enough" territory for the next few years (I hope) but 128GB of storage is no good.

Can't bring myself to switch brands at this point. GrapheneOS is just too good to give up.

Kind of funny how quickly we've flipped from "you should treat LLM output like advice from a random stranger" to "you should treat advice from a random stranger like LLM output".

Either way, it's the right idea. If you can't understand what you're doing but you do it anyway, you're going to create all kinds of problems for yourself.

Nobody should feel a strong need to upgrade after only two generations. Same deal with most tech like GPUs and CPUs.

I use my phone a lot and my Pixel 7 is fine. The primary factors driving my last couple upgrades were battery degradation and software support. Neither should be a big problem with a Fairphone.

I'm also trying to decide whether to stick with the Pixel/GrapheneOS ecosystem or go for Fairphone.

How hard/expensive was it to replace your battery? I looked on iFixIt and it seemed a lot harder than my orevious phones.

SQLite would definitely be smaller, faster, and require less memory.

Thing is, it's 2025, roughly 20 years since anybody's given half a shit about storage efficiency, memory efficiency, or even CPU efficiency for anything so small. Presumably this is not something they need to query dynamically.

It's not necessarily the most efficient, but it's the best guess we have. This is largely done by trial and error. There is no hard proof or surefire way to calculate optimal arrangements; this is just the best that anyone's come up with so far.

It's sort of like chess. Using computers, we can analyze moves and games at a very advanced level, but we still haven't "solved" chess, and we can't determine whether a game or move is perfect in general. There's no formula to solve it without exhaustively searching through every possible move, which would take more time than the universe has existed, even with our most powerful computers.

Perhaps someday, someone will figure out a way to prove this mathematically.

do they just want everything to be crawled

Yes. Web crawling has been a normal and vital part of the web from day 1. We'd have no search engines without crawlers.

The web is user-centric by design. I'm sick of tech companies trying to flip the script and hoard information, most of which is not theirs to begin with (e.g. Google, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, etc.).

When people say eat the rich, I think they generally mean to start from the top.

Ring was an obvious trojan horse from day 1. It's depressing how many people are only just realizing this, and how many people still don't even give a shit.

If you have a Ring camera, you are a scourge to your entire community.

Yes. Most original NES, SNES, and Gameboy cartridges have probably lost their saved data by now, but the batteries can be replaced relatively easily. If I remember right, they're a standard type, like the ones used for watches or hearing aids.

I know that some my old NES games retained their data at least into the 2000s. Been a while since I pulled them out and checked.

Edit: I realize this article is talking about the game data, not save data. I don't know what type of memory older games used for the ROM or if it needs periodic power. I think the batteries were only for the writeable save data.

This matches my experience and the general consensus I've seen online. The 6 series had major overheating problems. Later generations get noticeably warm but not so much that it causes serious problems.

:o

The concept is real. I mean, anyone who thought "vibe coding" would be a viable career path for long enough to actually have a career was just not paying attention to reality.

Right now it legitimately takes some expertise to get good results from AI coding. (Most people doing it now get, at best, convincingly passable results.) But the job of a "vibe coder" is much simpler than the job of a conventional programmer, and it will become increasingly simple to automate out the human's role. It's not like progress is going to suddenly stop. The fruit is hanging so low that it might as well be on the ground.

Agreed, seems weird. But I'm optimistic when a series ending is announced well in advance. It means they'll have time to finish it properly instead of hedging their bets, uncertain if they'll be renewed.

They actually want to increase what can be done in user mode, to reduce reliance on kernel mode code.

That's basically what Apple did with macOS 11. They deprecated kernel extensions and replaced them with "system extensions", and created new APIs so security tools, VPNs and such could function without kernel-level privileges.