That's the part I can't figure out! I think diagnosing of tongue tie is more common now then it was when I was a baby. In the early 80's, unless the tongue tie was bad enough to prevent the baby from feeding, they probably just said "Meh, good enough". But it's weird that it wasn't called out in my dozens of other dentist visits over the years! I had no idea I was supposed to be able to reach my back edge my molars!
It sounds like we have a similar level of tongue tie! I can stick my tongue out, but not quite as far as I would be able to if it weren't for the tongue tie. Yeah I'm leaning toward having it corrected, I had the dentist check what insurance would cover and I'd only have to color 180 out of pocket so that isn't too bad.
That's how I found out too! In 2019, I was at the dentist for a cleaning and check up. The dental hygienist had her hands in my mouth as they do and said "Oh, you're a bit tongue tied", I thought she was being cheeky that I was talkative since she had her hands in my mouth. When I could talk next, I asked what she meant, and she said the flap of skin I have attached on the bottom of my tongue, anchoring it to the floor of my mouth shouldn't be there. And that it's called being tongue tied, they correct it in infants when they find it.
So I had the same response you did, I had no idea it was just a phrase we use to say someone wasn't talkative, but rather something physically that someone can have!
Good, there is nothing wrong with having rules against spreading misinformation if that information can be objectively be verified as false. This weird idea we have to be polite and treat people spreading misinformation with respect is silly. Opinions are opinions, but spreading verifiable lies shouldn't be allowed.
I think the big argument for is more so that I can't reach the back surface of my molars, so I can't clean them like normal people do. The other thing I have trouble with is, and I will not mince words, is performing oral sex. I'm a straight guy, and the day after performing oral sex, I can feel a little spot on the flap under my tongue that tears a little from trying to stick my tongue out. It's a pretty good indicator that being tongue tied is in fact reducing my tongues mobility in a bunch of ways.
I do agree with those saying to get a second opinion. Since my dentist literally built a whole facility dedicated to fixing tongue ties, I feel like they're not going to be honest since they stand to benefit from it. But on the other hand, it causes me problems, and it can fix those problems. I'm quite torn, with any elective surgery, there is always the worry that I'd regret it.
I also feel like because the movie didn't explain as much as the book or original movie did, people just assumed the new movie was profound and deep, and loved it because of it. I asked a friend who loved it but hadn't read the book or watched the 80's movie, who the Sardukar are. He answered that they were a religious order who were good fighters. Again, the new movie just doesn't give enough context or answers to stuff.
I also can't express how much I didn't care for the new Worm design.
I recently switched my email from gmail to proton mail, because fuck google's.. well... everything. Glad to hear that Proton Mail keeps fighting for privacy!
I love the first Dune book, and I love the goofy 80's Dune movie, which was pretty close to the book in terms of getting a lot of the internal dialog in place. But I hated the new Dune movie. I didn't like how sterile and empty they made the palace, or the weird anus mouth design of the sand worms. Or the silly use of balloons to help lift harvesters. I very much didn't like how they made Lady Jessica an emotional mess, instead of being in control of her outward emotions, as she was trained to do.
They also screwed up the personal defense shields REAL BAD. The idea that the shields react to kinetic energy, so a fast moving project from a firearm would get stopped, but a slow moving blade would pass through. The fight near the end had people being killed by fast sword strikes by hitting the shields, it was just so jarring and lazy. They also completely misrepresented who and what the Sardukar are. Based on how many people loved the movie, I have an unpopular opinion. Though I found that most people who absolutely loved the movie hadn't seen the original movie, or read the first book, so they didn't know anything to color their impression.
I've gotten a lot of mileage out of co-optimus.com when looking for co-op games to play with friends. It's really helpful, you can filter games out by platform, number of players, online co-op, local co-op, split screen, dated released. It's very helpful!
I held off on playing NMS until last year, I have a lot of experience with similar games on PC like Empyrion and had my expectations set by that game. Boy you couldn't be more right about the planets, just about actual planet size, but nothing interesting but cloned points of interest. Empryion's world generation is fantastic, very believable and smooth, transitioning between biomes and having those features being visible from space.
I got around 10ish or 15ish hours out of NMS, and I just noped out when I realized the best way to get a ship was to buy it from a random NPC who just landed, found a ship I liked, bought it, didn't like the color and found I couldn't repaint it (at that time, maybe that changed). Between all the stuff we've mentioned, plus weird bugs like ships warping into atmosphere but then glitching through the ground. Meh.
Light No Fire looks interesting, but my gut feeling is, it'll be a huuuuge world, largely full of nothing worth while. I'll keep an eye on it to see how it develops, and how it's received at launch. My default position is .... cautiously optimistic.
My favorite example of this is Tribes 1, players found if you tap jump fast while going down a hill, they could "ski" down and gain a lot of momentum. The dev's hadn't intended this to be the case, but players loved it, and the dev's thought it was cool so they left it in. Now skiing is just considered a primary trait of Tribes games.
I know it's so damn frequent that Occam's Razor gets trotted out, but in this situation, I think the simplest explanation is probably the most likely. Life developing in general is insanely rare in the universe, and there is no law that states that life HAS to evolve into intelligent life that would develop technologies, and space travel.
I've most frequently seeing AF mean "As fuck". It's even gotten to the point of bumper stickers that say things like "Mommy AF". Outside that meaning, I'm not sure what else AF could mean.
I agree about the Dark Forest hypothesis. Also the idea that other alien life just knew to be quiet up front is silly, for the same reason we've been blasting radio waves into the universe the moment we figured out how.
Nah, us being first is scary to me in the sense if life is nearly impossible to form, and we're all alone, that means we can search planet after planet, after planet and only find dead lifeless environments. That's not nearly as fun of a thought as the universe being full of life, and all the amazing discoveries we'd make exploring. That's all I meant.
I find the idea that life is insanely rare, and that 99.99999999999999999999 of every planet and moon is lifeless. Even if we some how find a way to explore the cosmos, we'll be searching empty dead rocks for the rest of our species lives. That's scary to me.
Power Word Loon. I love this, thank you.