GBU_28 @ GBU_28 @lemm.ee

Posts

1

Comments

5,350

Joined

2 yr. ago

Periwinkle blue 👇📃

Edit wth who downvotes this

And reports from authorities, at the time I commented that, were raising concerns that it may not have been the same person. My comment was one of caution, yours is of luck.

I'm totally speculating, but if he's been on the run, he may not have changed his plans on certain... conclusions.

Unless he planned on not surviving

Huh? A random person, who may not have known the news or reasoning, may be the target of the Internet's ire. That hypothetical sucks, and is all I'm discussing. Sure, they possibly did know the story, but remember millions of people are far less online/news attached than most here.

Edit be mad at ceos all you want, I'm not discussing that here. I'm discussing the potential person who spotted the person of interest

You mean how I used the word speculative?

Or how I said conclusions are fraught?

You didn't know any better than anyone else, and perhaps you forget the Boston bomber situation, but it's always good to slow down on plastering someone's face/identity on a crime till reports are concrete.

Of course, but we are here on Lemmy. When you say "let's not..." On Lemmy, you're addressing Lemmy

No, Lemmy will crucify that person even if they had no clue about the situation at all.

Lemmy is all in on inciting violence

Edit clarification, I agree with you.

Holy shit yes. For like 100 reasons.

For one: what if the child was in an accident and brought to the hospital? Right now you're nothing. Visitation and medical decisions.

Renting allows those without the needed capital to access a resource.

Backing out from that, one should question why shelter is a resource that someone cannot access on a minimum wage salary.

So, fundamentally, landlording isn't inherently evil, but it's presentation in the system is inherently corrupting. As in, at any moment that someone retains an excess of shelter they do not need, and instead rent it out, they are constraining the market for their own gain, at the detriment of others who in need shelter.

Next consider degrees of influence: large corporations buy up tons of units and exert inordinate power on the system. They systemically unbalance the purchasing ability of normal folk, due to process or sheer wealth. Fine, that's the high water of corruption. From there it's only shades of difference down to the mom and pop landlord. It's up to you to decide where they land on the scale.

I can agree with Elon that the scorpion will sting.

What do the rest of us do with that info?

Good on you. I mean no assumption, only shared advice from some years in the trenches.

They should remake it shot for shot with Chris Evans and Tom cruise or something. No additions, a literal rewind.

I would encourage you to CAREFULLY and WITH DETAIL listen to your senior tutors (senior grisled paramedics, charge nurses, etc). They have a very particular line to walk and you can blow the show if you don't learn the language.

It's performative...everyone in the equation wants the patient to get the best, but if you haul off and make it obvious, they may be screwed.

Not saying you'd do that, but it's a new world of...bullshit nuance.

Edit and if they ever give you a knowing look, and ask you to check the blinker fluid, or if the vending machine is stocked with saline, nod, and go "check". They want to talk to the patient with no witnesses, so they can coach them on how to fit a proper insurance code.

insert Boomer humor /s

I'd honestly take an interruption by my wife far more seriously

For sure. I also mean when traveling.

Preesh.

As an EMT I rode with too many people who were sobbing in the bus because they knew the financial hit that was coming when we got to the ER.

Real talk, read and understand the laws in whatever state you're in. There are varying expectations on retreat, and life threatening danger.

Again, I'm just chatting with you,.. not upset, but my core point hinges on a statement you said:

"I mean yeah sure they could, but they won't". That's at their whim. At their choice. It could seem steadfast and sure now, but they could change their mind tomorrow.

Indeed the fediverse provides an out: set up shop elsewhere.

Edit I also meant the mods that are being tattled on...they could just nuke everyone who comments on the trippin comments

Oh yeah I'm a reader for sure. It's interesting but ultimately it's like "oh I hope they don't just ban everyone"