FutileRecipe @ FutileRecipe @lemmy.world

Posts

9

Comments

400

Joined

2 yr. ago

How about the ~100 Grammer? Or even just "100 G" if you're trying to be "hip."

But when did you set Authy up? I don't recall when Authy made the change, but it wouldn't kick you out. It would, however, prevent you from signing in a new device. So if you lose your phone, you might lose access to those tokens...

Bernie is working with the Democrats. The Democrats are not working with Bernie. Bernie is picking the lesser of the two evils, as he sees it.

The criticism is not that Bernie doesn't work with them, but rather they are not working with him. There is a difference between those two.

throw away their votes on a 3rd party...That’s how Trump got elected a 2nd term

While that didn't help, I don't think it was the cause. Last I checked, if you gave Harris the 3rd party votes, Trump would still win. Republicans had increased voter turnout, while Democrats decreased...and overall turnout decreased. So it was apathy and lack of votes that won.

But I'm busy, going off memory, and didn't check latest stats. So please, feel free to correct me.

Ref: https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

If that's the case, DOGE should recommend to replace her with a mirror. Think of the savings.

House Ethics Committee Republicans temporarily blocked releasing findings from a probe into allegations of sexual misconduct and other accusations...Gaetz denies the allegations, including claims he had sex with a 17-year-old.

What's the big deal? Was he found innocent, like he says he is? Cool, release it. Something something if he has nothing to hide.

Or was he found guilty? Cool, release it.

Same website (granted, different author, but), same inflammatory language, same vendor, referencing previous erroneous article...I'm not even gonna read this one. Just going to copy/paste my previous response from the previous post:

At a certain point it's the consumer's (and blog writer's) fault, and that's after EoL. Not patching a supported one and just getting rid of support, saying buy a newer one? Yeah, that's bad.

Continuing to not support an EoL model that you already don't support due to EoL (or even dropping support for an EoL model that no one expected you to support in the first place due to EoL)? Non-issue.

Doesn't he have a rather large role in the party of small government?

the federal government has long had hesitance to hold figures like presidents, senators, and supreme court justices to account, and this is just an extension of that.

Because if they start holding others in similar offices to account, they might have to hold themselves as well, and that ain't happening.

develop our factory base and our sourcing capability in alternative countries, like Cambodia, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, etc."

From the same article:

Trump has proposed a 60% tax on imports from China, plus a universal tariff of 10%-20% on imports from all foreign countries.

So those goods still get a tariff, probably raising prices for the American consumer, just not as steep as from China. I thought the primary goal of the tariff was to move production back to America (which is a whole thing and not as simple as flipping a switch), which this does not do...and it wasn't necessarily to try to limit China's economy,which it probably doesn't even put a dent in.

The Democrats did not fail us. WE DID. We failed.

Can the people, by definition, fail? What happened to the "will of the people" and democracy that Americans go on about?

If this is what won, this is obviously what the American people wanted/chose.

You actively sought loss...you didnt listen and lost...

I'm genuinely confused. What are you saying? The American voter currently only has two options: vote Democrat or vote Republican. Anything else, as it stands in present day America, throws the vote away.

I think you're saying voting Democrat is "actively seeking loss," yet the only other option is to...vote Republican, which they wanted even less?

Help me out here, as your logic ain't logicing.

The 2/3rds of American adults that are disenfranchised without representation are the victims.

The real victims (with a say/vote) are the Americans who voted for Harris. The people who voted for Trump and those who abstained from voting actively and passively chose what's coming.

The first, and foremost failure, is the Republican party.

They are not a failure. They are exactly what they want to be, they are exactly who they said they are, and they won the election. Sounds like the GOP is doing alright to me, from a GOP perspective.

And if you can't because they've been moved or "mysteriously misplaced," charge him for grand larceny and arrest him (IANAL so there is probably a better legal term for this).

I don't think that "sure, I stole from them, but I "lost" what I stole so we cool now," is a valid legal defense. But I'm not a disbarred lawyer, so I could be wrong.

Is there any chance that shit was rigged this time around?

There's always a chance of almost anything, but it is very slim (conspiracy theory) with no evidence to support it:

"Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure," per the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly.

Source: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/statement-cisa-director-easterly-security-2024-elections

Harris was popular when she first announced.

I don't think she was popular when first announced, rather the fact that not-Biden was popular.

Reuters has a different story....

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/

And hopefully does something about. Disciplinary for the poor OPSEC and/or better resources to avoid it and/or better laws to stop this unfettered data collection and/or better training to avoid it in the future. Here's hoping. Holds breath

Depends. In my experience, it usually does exist. Now there are hallucinations where GPT makes up stuff or just misinterprets what it read. But it's super easy to read the GPT output, look at the cited work, skim works for relevance, then tweak the wording and citing to match.

If you just copy/paste and take GPT's word for it without the minimal amount of checking, you're digging your own grave.